Literature DB >> 15345419

Comparison of fluorescence microscopy and solid-phase cytometry methods for counting bacteria in water.

John T Lisle1, Martin A Hamilton, Alan R Willse, Gordon A McFeters.   

Abstract

Total direct counts of bacterial abundance are central in assessing the biomass and bacteriological quality of water in ecological and industrial applications. Several factors have been identified that contribute to the variability in bacterial abundance counts when using fluorescent microscopy, the most significant of which is retaining an adequate number of cells per filter to ensure an acceptable level of statistical confidence in the resulting data. Previous studies that have assessed the components of total-direct-count methods that contribute to this variance have attempted to maintain a bacterial cell abundance value per filter of approximately 10(6) cells filter(-1). In this study we have established the lower limit for the number of bacterial cells per filter at which the statistical reliability of the abundance estimate is no longer acceptable. Our results indicate that when the numbers of bacterial cells per filter were progressively reduced below 10(5), the microscopic methods increasingly overestimated the true bacterial abundance (range, 15.0 to 99.3%). The solid-phase cytometer only slightly overestimated the true bacterial abundances and was more consistent over the same range of bacterial abundances per filter (range, 8.9 to 12.5%). The solid-phase cytometer method for conducting total direct counts of bacteria was less biased and performed significantly better than any of the microscope methods. It was also found that microscopic count data from counting 5 fields on three separate filters were statistically equivalent to data from counting 20 fields on a single filter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15345419      PMCID: PMC520900          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.9.5343-5348.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  16 in total

1.  Effectiveness of CSE to counterstain particles and dead bacterial cells with permeabilised membranes: application to viability assessment in waters.

Authors:  P Catala; N Parthuisot; L Bernard; J Baudart; K Lemarchand; P Lebaron
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Effect of antibiotics on viability staining of Escherichia coli in solid phase cytometry.

Authors:  E D'Haese; H J Nelis
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 3.  Use of fluorescent probes to assess physiological functions of bacteria at single-cell level.

Authors:  F Joux; P Lebaron
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.700

4.  Enumeration of viable anaerobic bacteria by solid phase cytometry under aerobic conditions.

Authors:  Karen Vermis; Peter A R Vandamme; Hans J Nelis
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.363

5.  A 210-min solid phase cytometry test for the enumeration of Escherichia coli in drinking water.

Authors:  S O Van Poucke; H J Nelis
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.772

6.  Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  J E Hobbie; R J Daley; S Jasper
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Statistical analysis of the direct count method for enumerating bacteria.

Authors:  D Kirchman; J Sigda; R Kapuscinski; R Mitchell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  An investigation of errors in direct counts of aquatic bacteria by epifluorescence microscopy, with reference to a new method for dyeing membrane filters.

Authors:  J G Jones; B M Simon
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1975-12

Review 9.  Rapid direct methods for enumeration of specific, active bacteria in water and biofilms.

Authors:  G A McFeters; B H Pyle; J T Lisle; S C Broadaway
Journal:  Symp Ser Soc Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999

10.  Rapid and sensitive enumeration of viable diluted cells of members of the family enterobacteriaceae in freshwater and drinking water.

Authors:  Julia Baudart; Josée Coallier; Patrick Laurent; Michèle Prévost
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  12 in total

1.  Rapid quantification of the toxic alga Prymnesium parvum in natural samples by use of a specific monoclonal antibody and solid-phase cytometry.

Authors:  N J West; R Bacchieri; G Hansen; C Tomas; P Lebaron; H Moreau
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Method for assessment of viability and morphological changes of bacteria in the early stage of colony formation on a simulated natural environment.

Authors:  Yumi Shimomura; Ryuzo Ohno; Fusako Kawai; Kazuhide Kimbara
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Detection and quantification of viable airborne bacteria and fungi using solid-phase cytometry.

Authors:  Lies M E Vanhee; Hans J Nelis; Tom Coenye
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Optimization of two immunofluorescent antibodies for the detection of Escherichia coli using immunofluorescent microscopy and flow cytometry.

Authors:  Moira McCarthy; Sarah C Culloty
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  Rapid and direct quantification of viable Candida species in whole blood by use of immunomagnetic separation and solid-phase cytometry.

Authors:  Lies M E Vanhee; Wouter Meersseman; Katrien Lagrou; Johan Maertens; Hans J Nelis; Tom Coenye
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Rapid and sensitive quantification of Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio mimicus cells in water samples by use of catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization combined with solid-phase cytometry.

Authors:  Sonja Schauer; Regina Sommer; Andreas H Farnleitner; Alexander K T Kirschner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Agreement, precision, and accuracy of epifluorescence microscopy methods for enumeration of total bacterial numbers.

Authors:  Eun-Young Seo; Tae-Seok Ahn; Young-Gun Zo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  A Low-Cost Digital Microscope with Real-Time Fluorescent Imaging Capability.

Authors:  Md Mehedi Hasan; Mohammad Wajih Alam; Khan A Wahid; Sayem Miah; Kiven Erique Lukong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Regenerable ZnO/GaAs Bulk Acoustic Wave Biosensor for Detection of Escherichia coli in "Complex" Biological Medium.

Authors:  Juliana Chawich; Walid M Hassen; Céline Elie-Caille; Thérèse Leblois; Jan J Dubowski
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-07

10.  Enumerating Microorganism Surrogates for Groundwater Transport Studies Using Solid-Phase Cytometry.

Authors:  Margaret E Stevenson; A Paul Blaschke; Sonja Schauer; Matthias Zessner; Regina Sommer; Andreas H Farnleitner; Alexander K T Kirschner
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 2.520

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.