Literature DB >> 15344340

Current legal status of advance directives in the United States.

Ben A Rich1.   

Abstract

Advance directive legislation has been in place throughout much of the United States for nearly 3 decades. The right to give an informed consent to or refusal of medical treatment has been recognized by state and federal courts, and that right has been determined to survive the loss of decisional capacity and may be exercised through the execution of instructional or proxy directives. Despite these developments, the percentage of the adult population with a formal advance directive of any type has never exceeded 15%. Moreover, a remarkable number of these directives are ambiguous and/or their existence is unknown to the physicians who are expected to rely upon them. Even unambiguous directives may not be followed at the critical stage in the trajectory of a patient's illness, and the accountability for such disregard by health care institutions or professionals is negligible to nonexistent. Nevertheless, there is real potential for advance directives, as a key element to sound advance care planning, to fulfill their initial promise as instruments of the prospective autonomy of patients. In order for that potential to be realized, primary care physicians must embrace advance care planning as a part of their professional responsibility to patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15344340     DOI: 10.1007/bf03040929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  7 in total

Review 1.  Suing health care providers for saving lives. Liability for providing unwanted life-sustaining treatment.

Authors:  K F Rodriguez
Journal:  J Leg Med       Date:  1999-03

2.  The illusion of autonomy at the end of life: unconsented life support and the wrongful life analogy.

Authors:  Philip G Peters
Journal:  UCLA Law Rev       Date:  1998-02

3.  Courts, gender and "the right to die".

Authors:  S H Miles; A August
Journal:  Law Med Health Care       Date:  1990 Spring-Summer

4.  Confronting the "near irrelevance" of advance directives.

Authors:  R Dresser
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1994

5.  The Medical Directive. A new comprehensive advance care document.

Authors:  L L Emanuel; E J Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The physician's responsibility toward hopelessly ill patients. A second look.

Authors:  S H Wanzer; D D Federman; S J Adelstein; C K Cassel; E H Cassem; R E Cranford; E W Hook; B Lo; C G Moertel; P Safar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 Nov 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

  7 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Advance treatment directives for people with severe mental illness.

Authors:  Leslie Anne Campbell; Steve R Kisely
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-01-21

Review 2.  The value of an ethics history?

Authors:  Abhay K Das; Graham P Mulley
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 18.000

3.  [Validation of the knowledge and attitudes of health professionals in the Living Will Declaration process].

Authors:  Eugenio Contreras-Fernández; Francisco Javier Barón-López; Camila Méndez-Martínez; José Carlos Canca-Sánchez; Isabel Cabezón Rodríguez; Francisco Rivas-Ruiz
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 4.  Dying well with reduced agency: a scoping review and thematic synthesis of the decision-making process in dementia, traumatic brain injury and frailty.

Authors:  Giles Birchley; Kerry Jones; Richard Huxtable; Jeremy Dixon; Jenny Kitzinger; Linda Clare
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.652

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.