Literature DB >> 15343230

Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor.

Margaret R Chou1, Doron Kreiser, M Mark Taslimi, Maurice L Druzin, Yasser Y El-Sayed.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether ultrasonography is more accurate than vaginal examination in the determination of fetal occiput position in the second stage of labor. STUDY
DESIGN: Eighty-eight patients in the second stage of labor were evaluated by vaginal examination and by combined transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound examination to determine occiput position. These predictions of position were compared with the actual delivery position at vaginal delivery after spontaneous restitution or at cesarean delivery. Different examiners performed the vaginal examinations and the ultrasound examinations. Each examiner was blinded to the determination of the other examiner.
RESULTS: Vaginal examination determined fetal occiput position correctly 71.6% of the time; ultrasound examination determined fetal occiput position correctly 92.0% of the time (P=.018).
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound examination is more accurate than vaginal examination in the diagnosis of fetal occiput position in the second stage of labor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15343230     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

Review 1.  The effectiveness of intrapartum  ultrasonography in assessing cervical dilatation, head station and position: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yaw Amo Wiafe; Bill Whitehead; Heather Venables; Emmanuel Kweku Nakua
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2016-10-06

2.  Dynamic Changes in the Myometrium during the Third Stage of Labor, Evaluated Using Two-Dimensional Ultrasound, in Women with Normal and Abnormal Third Stage of Labor and in Women with Obstetric Complications.

Authors:  Manasi Patwardhan; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Hyunyoung Ahn; Steven J Korzeniewski; Alyse Schwartz; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Study protocol. IDUS - Instrumental delivery & ultrasound: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery.

Authors:  Deirdre J Murphy; Gerard Burke; Alan A Montgomery; Meenakshi Ramphul
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Acceptability of Intrapartum Ultrasound Monitoring - Experience from a Romanian Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  D G Iliescu; S Tudorache; M L Cara; R Dragusin; O Carbunaru; M Florea; C Patru; L Zorila; A Dragoescu; L Novac; N Cernea
Journal:  Curr Health Sci J       Date:  2015-12-22

Review 5.  Intrapartum sonography - eccentricity or necessity?

Authors:  Marzena Dębska; Piotr Kretowicz; Romuald Dębski
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2015-06-30

6.  Automatic evaluation of progression angle and fetal head station through intrapartum echographic monitoring.

Authors:  Sergio Casciaro; Francesco Conversano; Ernesto Casciaro; Giulia Soloperto; Emanuele Perrone; Gian Carlo Di Renzo; Antonio Perrone
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  Fetal Head Position during the First Stage of Labor: Comparison between Vaginal Examination and Transabdominal Ultrasound.

Authors:  Jyothi Shetty; Vinod Aahir; Deeksha Pandey; Prashanth Adiga; Asha Kamath
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.