Literature DB >> 1534312

Quality of life with three antihypertensive treatments. Cilazapril, atenolol, nifedipine.

A E Fletcher1, C J Bulpitt, D M Chase, W C Collins, C D Furberg, T K Goggin, A J Hewett, A M Neiss.   

Abstract

A multicenter, randomized double-blind study of 6 months' duration was performed in 540 patients (average age 54 years, 57% male) with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension to determine the relative effects on quality of life of cilazapril, atenolol, and nifedipine retard. Quality of life was assessed by using both a self-administered and an interviewer-administered questionnaire; the assessment included a complaint score (symptoms checklist), Health Status Index, assessment of work satisfaction, Psychological General Well-being Index, Profile of Mood States subscales, and life satisfaction assessment. Psychomotor function was measured by the Reitan Trail Making test B. At the end of the trial, diastolic blood pressure had fallen by an average of 15 mm Hg in all three groups, but significantly (p = 0.01) more patients taking cilazapril required the addition of a diuretic (36%) compared with those taking atenolol (25%) or nifedipine retard (24%). No significant differences in quality of life were observed between cilazapril and atenolol during the trial. Symptomatic complaints increased on nifedipine retard (p = 0.02) and contributed to a higher discontinuation rate (21% discontinued treatment compared with 13% and 14% taking atenolol and cilazapril, respectively, p = 0.04). However, a possible improvement in the fatigue subscale (p = 0.04) was also observed on nifedipine retard. The 95% confidence intervals showed that none of the drugs in this trial produced an effect equivalent to that previously reported between captopril and methyldopa in the Psychological General Well Being Index or between captopril and methyldopa or propranolol in Trail Making test B.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1534312     DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.19.6.499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  24 in total

Review 1.  Selective versus nonselective beta adrenoceptor antagonists in hypertension.

Authors:  L M Van Bortel; A J Ament
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the Psychological General Well-Being Index.

Authors:  X Badia; F Gutiérrez; I Wiklund; J Alonso
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Quality of life as an outcome measure.

Authors:  C J Bulpitt
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Health-related quality-of-life measurement in hypertension. A review of randomised controlled drug trials.

Authors:  I Côté; J P Grégoire; J Moisan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Quality-of-life instruments in hypertension.

Authors:  C J Bulpitt; A E Fletcher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Fatigue varies by social class in African Americans but not Caucasian Americans.

Authors:  Wayne A Bardwell; Stephen C Burke; KaMala S Thomas; Christian Carter; Kimberly Weingart; Joel E Dimsdale
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2006

Review 7.  Effect of antihypertensive agents on quality of life in the elderly.

Authors:  Roberto Fogari; Annalisa Zoppi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Management guidelines in essential hypertension: report of the second working party of the British Hypertension Society.

Authors:  P Sever; G Beevers; C Bulpitt; A Lever; L Ramsay; J Reid; J Swales
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-04-10

Review 9.  A critical review of dimension-specific measures of health-related quality of life in cross-cultural research.

Authors:  M J Naughton; I Wiklund
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Evaluating the psychometric characteristics of the Psychological General Well-Being Index with a new response scale.

Authors:  D A Revicki; N K Leidy; L Howland
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.