Literature DB >> 15342859

Healthy Steps: a case study of innovation in pediatric practice.

Barry Zuckerman1, Steven Parker, Margot Kaplan-Sanoff, Marilyn Augustyn, Michael C Barth.   

Abstract

Healthy Steps (HS) represents a significant innovation in the way pediatric primary care can be delivered. Based on the standards and principles of Bright Futures and the American Academy of Pediatrics Health Supervision Guidelines, HS enhances and expands traditional pediatric care by including a child development specialist (Healthy Steps specialist) as part of the pediatric practice team. Services offered by this person, typically a nurse, early childhood educator, or social worker, include more time to spend discussing preventive issues during well-child visits, home visits, a telephone information line exclusively addressing developmental and behavioral concerns, new written materials, and more seamless linkages to community resources and parent support groups. The original HS cohort consisted of 15 pediatric practices in a variety of settings (private practices, health centers, pediatric training programs). Evaluated for the effects of HS on their family were 3737 intervention and comparison families. HS families received significantly more preventive and developmental services, compared to families in the control group. HS families were also less likely to be dissatisfied with their pediatric primary care. Additionally, HS had a positive impact on parenting in many areas including adherence to health visits, nutritional practices, developmental stimulation, appropriate disciplinary techniques, and correct sleeping position. Other outcome measures (such as initiation or duration of breastfeeding, child development knowledge, sense of competence, and reports of child language development at 2 years of age) did not differ between intervention and comparison group. Compared to other early childhood intervention efforts, HS offers a comparable positive impact on parenting at a relatively inexpensive cost: an estimated 400 dollars per family per year (compared to 4500 dollars from Early Head Start). Approximately 3 years after the evaluation of HS ended, 10 of the original 24 sites are still in operation, and an additional 24 sites have started up. Although funding and reimbursement remain an important barrier, continued growth of HS suggests an abiding interest in this approach to expand and enhance preventive and developmental care in pediatric primary care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15342859     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2003-0999-L

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  16 in total

1.  A Parent Coach Model for Well-Child Care Among Low-Income Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Tumaini R Coker; Sandra Chacon; Marc N Elliott; Yovana Bruno; Toni Chavis; Christopher Biely; Christina D Bethell; Sandra Contreras; Naomi A Mimila; Jeffrey Mercado; Paul J Chung
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Low-income parents' views on the redesign of well-child care.

Authors:  Tumaini R Coker; Paul J Chung; Burton O Cowgill; Leian Chen; Michael A Rodriguez
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Is a Positive Developmental-Behavioral Screening Score Sufficient to Justify Referral? A Review of Evidence and Theory.

Authors:  R Christopher Sheldrick; Daryl Garfinkel
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.107

4.  Do patient-centered medical homes reduce emergency department visits?

Authors:  Guy David; Candace Gunnarsson; Philip A Saynisch; Ravi Chawla; Somesh Nigam
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Does well-child care have a future in pediatrics?

Authors:  Tumaini R Coker; Tainayah Thomas; Paul J Chung
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 6.  Well-child care clinical practice redesign for young children: a systematic review of strategies and tools.

Authors:  Tumaini R Coker; Annika Windon; Candice Moreno; Mark A Schuster; Paul J Chung
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Well-child care clinical practice redesign for serving low-income children.

Authors:  Tumaini R Coker; Candice Moreno; Paul G Shekelle; Mark A Schuster; Paul J Chung
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Use of videotaped interactions during pediatric well-child care: impact at 33 months on parenting and on child development.

Authors:  Alan L Mendelsohn; Purnima T Valdez; Virginia Flynn; Gilbert M Foley; Samantha B Berkule; Suzy Tomopoulos; Arthur H Fierman; Wendy Tineo; Benard P Dreyer
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.225

Review 9.  Social determinants of health, personalized medicine, and child maltreatment.

Authors:  Wendy G Lane; Howard Dubowitz
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.756

10.  Beyond Early Adversity: The Role of Parenting in Infant Physical Health.

Authors:  Jessica A Stern; Roseriet Beijers; Katherine B Ehrlich; Jude Cassidy; Carolina de Weerth
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.