Literature DB >> 15341716

Bowel preparation for gastrointestinal procedures.

Andrew R Brown1, Jack A DiPalma.   

Abstract

Adequate colonic cleansing is essential for accurate and safe colonic procedures. Common preparations for cleansing include diet in combination with a cathartic agent, gut lavage, and phosphate preparations. The diet used with a cathartic consists of clear liquids or is designed to leave a minimal colonic fecal residue with laxatives. Gut lavage solutions wash out the colon in a safe and effective manner. Phosphate preparations offer an attractive alternative due to smaller volumes required for ingestion; however, electrolyte disturbances can occur. This review discusses the development and clinical experience with various colon cleansing regimens and efforts to improve the tolerability and safety of preparation for colonoscopy, virtual colonoscopy, colon surgery, barium enema, and flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15341716     DOI: 10.1007/s11894-004-0056-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep        ISSN: 1522-8037


  46 in total

1.  Technology Status Evaluation report. Colonoscopy preparations. May 2001.

Authors:  D B Nelson; A N Barkun; K P Block; J S Burdick; G G Ginsberg; D A Greenwald; P B Kelsey; N L Nakao; A Slivka; P Smith; N Vakil
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Colonoscopy in octogenarians: a prospective outpatient study.

Authors:  Frank J Lukens; David S Loeb; Victor I Machicao; Sami R Achem; Michael F Picco
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Golytely lavage versus a standard colonoscopy preparation. Effect on normal colonic mucosal histology.

Authors:  P J Pockros; P Foroozan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  A comparison of bowel preparations for flexible sigmoidoscopy: oral magnesium citrate combined with oral bisacodyl, one hypertonic phosphate enema, or two hypertonic phosphate enemas.

Authors:  R K Fincher; E M Osgard; J L Jackson; J S Strong; R K Wong
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Senna vs. bisacodyl in addition to Golytely lavage for colonoscopy preparation--a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  D J Ziegenhagen; E Zehnter; W Tacke; T Gheorghiu; W Kruis
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Prospective, randomized, single-blind comparison of two preparations for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  E J Bini; J S Unger; J M Rieber; J Rosenberg; K Trujillo; E H Weinshel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Decreased efficacy of polyethylene glycol lavage solution (golytely) in the preparation of diabetic patients for outpatient colonoscopy: a prospective and blinded study.

Authors:  C Taylor; M L Schubert
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Thomas F Imperiale; Danielle R Latinovich; L Lisa Bratcher
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Electrolyte disorders following oral sodium phosphate administration for bowel cleansing in elderly patients.

Authors:  Yichayaou Beloosesky; Josef Grinblat; Avraham Weiss; Boris Grosman; Uzi Gafter; Avry Chagnac
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-04-14

10.  Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation.

Authors:  W J Adams; A P Meagher; D Z Lubowski; D W King
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Oral colorectal cleansing preparations in adults.

Authors:  Sherief Shawki; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Bowel preparation, the first step for a good quality colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ho-Su Lee; Jeong-Sik Byeon
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2014-01-28

Review 3.  Improving the view during flexible sigmoidoscopy: a systematic review of published randomized, controlled trials comparing the use of oral bowel preparation versus enema bowel preparation.

Authors:  Muhammad Shafique Sajid; Jennifer F Caswell; Mustafa A Q Abbas; Mirza K Baig; Malcolm R McFall
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-04-18

4.  A prospective randomized single-blind comparison of three methods of bowel preparation for outpatient flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  A L Gidwani; R Makar; D Garrett; R Gilliland
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Development and validation of the Bowel Cleansing Impact Review (BOCLIR).

Authors:  Lynda Doward; Jeanette Wilburn; Stephen P McKenna; Roger Leicester; Owen Epstein; Vicki Hedley; Sanjeeva Korala; James Twiss; Deborah Jones; Mike Geraint
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-15

Review 6.  Mechanism of action and toxicities of purgatives used for colonoscopy preparation.

Authors:  Margaret Adamcewicz; Dilip Bearelly; Gail Porat; Frank K Friedenberg
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 7.  Rectal effluent as a research tool.

Authors:  Jana M Rocker; Jack A DiPalma; Lewis K Pannell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  A prospective randomized single blind trial of Fleet phosphate enema versus glycerin suppositories as preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  D Underwood; R R Makar; A L Gidwani; S M Najfi; P Neilly; R Gilliland
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  More Is Not Always Better: A Randomized Trial Of Low Volume Oral Laxative, Enemas, And Combination Of Both Demonstrate That Enemas Alone Are Most Efficacious For Preparation For Flexible Sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  Lawrence Hookey; Samson Haimanot; Katherine Marchut; Stephen Vanner
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 4.488

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.