Literature DB >> 15341563

Navigating federalwide assurance requirements when conducting research in community-based care settings.

Juliana C Cartwright1, Susan E Hickman, Leslie Bevan, Charlotte L Shupert.   

Abstract

There is an urgent need for research on quality of life and healthcare delivery for older adults living in community-based care settings, yet implementing current federalwide assurance (FWA) requirements can be a challenge in these settings. This paper discusses FWA requirements for engagement in federally funded research as the requirements pertain to community-based care settings. Factors that impede community facilities in achieving FWA approval include lack of organizational structure to provide oversight for the ethical conduct of research, administrator concerns regarding potential liability associated with obtaining the FWA, lack of resources to complete required paperwork, and lack of staff knowledge about human subjects protection and federal requirements for participating in research. Effects of the FWA process on investigators include the burden of extra time needed to support community-based facilities to acquire a FWA and concerns that studies may be limited to only those community facilities with the resources to complete the FWA process. Investigator-initiated strategies for conducting research in community-based settings include considering study designs that are exempt from the FWA process and proactively assisting community-based facilities to acquire FWA status. Investigators need to work with potential research sites and the office for human research protections to ensure that subjects are protected without shifting the burden of protection to ill-prepared community administrators. Copyright 2004 American Geriatrics Society

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15341563     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52424.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  5 in total

1.  Awareness of Federal Regulatory Mechanisms Relevant to Community-Engaged Research: Survey of Health Disparities-Oriented NIH-Funded Investigators.

Authors:  Stephanie M Fullerton; Emily E Anderson; Ketch Cowan; Rachel C Malen; Doug Brugge
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  A randomized trial of heart failure disease management in skilled nursing facilities (SNF Connect): Lessons learned.

Authors:  Andrea Daddato; Heidi L Wald; Carolyn Horney; Diane L Fairclough; Erin C Leister; Marilyn Coors; Warren H Capell; Rebecca S Boxer
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Community-Engaged Research Ethics Review: Exploring Flexibility in Federal Regulations.

Authors:  Stephanie Solomon Cargill; Debra DeBruin; Milton Eder; Elizabeth Heitman; Julie M Kaberry; Jennifer B McCormick; Jennifer Opp; Richard Sharp; A Hal Strelnick; Sabune J Winkler; Mark Yarborough; Emily E Anderson
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2016 May-Jun

4.  Experiential Learning Through Participatory Action Research in Public Health Supports Community-Based Training of Future Health Professionals.

Authors:  Lisa K Marriott; Adam C Lipus; Laurie Choate; Jamie Smith; Leigh Coppola; William E Cameron; Jackilen Shannon
Journal:  Pedagogy Health Promot       Date:  2015-08-27

5.  Let's Get Healthy! Health awareness through public participation in an education and research exhibit.

Authors:  Lisa K Marriott; William E Cameron; Jonathan Q Purnell; Stephano Cetola; Matthew K Ito; Craig D Williams; Kenneth C Newcomb; Joan A Randall; Wyatt B Messenger; Adam C Lipus; Jackilen Shannon
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2012
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.