BACKGROUND: Incidence of amphibian deformities have increased in recent years, especially in the northern region of the United States. While many factors have been proposed as being responsible for generating deformities (e.g., contaminants, ultraviolet radiation [UV], parasites), no single cause has been definitively established. METHODS: To determine whether waterborne chemicals are responsible for amphibian deformities in ponds in north-central Minnesota, we deployed semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) in an impacted and a reference site to accumulate lipophilic contaminants. We then exposed native tadpoles (northern leopard frogs; Rana pipiens) to the SPMD extracts combined with two agricultural pesticides (atrazine, carbaryl) at two levels of UV radiation. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: UV radiation alone caused a slight increase in hatching success and tadpole growth rate. Deformity rate among hatchlings was high following exposure to SPMD extracts from the reference site in the absence of UV, suggesting that chemicals present at this site are broken down by UV to less harmful forms, or become less bioavailable. Conversely, impacted site SPMD extracts caused hatchling deformities only in the presence of UV, suggesting that UV potentiates the teratogenicity of the compounds present there. Impacted site SPMD extracts significantly increased the number of bony triangles among metamorphs, a common deformity observed at this site. The incidence of skin webbings increased significantly with SPMD extracts from both sites as well as with our pesticide control containing atrazine and carbaryl alone. CONCLUSIONS: Higher deformity rates among tadpoles reared in the presence of UV radiation and SPMD extracts from sites where deformities are common indicates a chemical compound (or compounds) in the water at this site may be causing the deformities. RECOMMENDATIONS AND OUTLOOK: It is important to examine the effects of chemical stressors in the presence of other natural stressors (e.g., UV radiation) to gain a better understanding of how multiple stressors work to impact amphibians and amphibian populations.
BACKGROUND: Incidence of amphibian deformities have increased in recent years, especially in the northern region of the United States. While many factors have been proposed as being responsible for generating deformities (e.g., contaminants, ultraviolet radiation [UV], parasites), no single cause has been definitively established. METHODS: To determine whether waterborne chemicals are responsible for amphibian deformities in ponds in north-central Minnesota, we deployed semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) in an impacted and a reference site to accumulate lipophilic contaminants. We then exposed native tadpoles (northern leopard frogs; Rana pipiens) to the SPMD extracts combined with two agricultural pesticides (atrazine, carbaryl) at two levels of UV radiation. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: UV radiation alone caused a slight increase in hatching success and tadpole growth rate. Deformity rate among hatchlings was high following exposure to SPMD extracts from the reference site in the absence of UV, suggesting that chemicals present at this site are broken down by UV to less harmful forms, or become less bioavailable. Conversely, impacted site SPMD extracts caused hatchling deformities only in the presence of UV, suggesting that UV potentiates the teratogenicity of the compounds present there. Impacted site SPMD extracts significantly increased the number of bony triangles among metamorphs, a common deformity observed at this site. The incidence of skin webbings increased significantly with SPMD extracts from both sites as well as with our pesticide control containing atrazine and carbaryl alone. CONCLUSIONS: Higher deformity rates among tadpoles reared in the presence of UV radiation and SPMD extracts from sites where deformities are common indicates a chemical compound (or compounds) in the water at this site may be causing the deformities. RECOMMENDATIONS AND OUTLOOK: It is important to examine the effects of chemical stressors in the presence of other natural stressors (e.g., UV radiation) to gain a better understanding of how multiple stressors work to impact amphibians and amphibian populations.
Authors: J D Petty; C E Orazio; J N Huckins; R W Gale; J A Lebo; J C Meadows; K R Echols; W L Cranor Journal: J Chromatogr A Date: 2000-05-19 Impact factor: 4.759
Authors: J G Burkhart; G Ankley; H Bell; H Carpenter; D Fort; D Gardiner; H Gardner; R Hale; J C Helgen; P Jepson; D Johnson; M Lannoo; D Lee; J Lary; R Levey; J Magner; C Meteyer; M D Shelby; G Lucier Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: J G Burkhart; J C Helgen; D J Fort; K Gallagher; D Bowers; T L Propst; M Gernes; J Magner; M D Shelby; G Lucier Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Uthpala A Jayawardena; Jason R Rohr; Ayanthi N Navaratne; Priyanie H Amerasinghe; Rupika S Rajakaruna Journal: Ecohealth Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 3.184
Authors: Brynn Taylor; David Skelly; Livia K Demarchis; Martin D Slade; Deron Galusha; Peter M Rabinowitz Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Lin Liu; Zhu Rao; Yuan Wang; Hamidreza Arandiyan; Jie Gong; Ming Liang; Feng Guo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: David A Alvarez; Steven R Corsi; Laura A De Cicco; Daniel L Villeneuve; Austin K Baldwin Journal: Environ Toxicol Chem Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 3.742