Literature DB >> 15340933

Methods for detecting functional classifications in neuroimaging data.

F DuBois Bowman1, Rajan Patel, Chengxing Lu.   

Abstract

Data-driven statistical methods are useful for examining the spatial organization of human brain function. Cluster analysis is one approach that aims to identify spatial classifications of temporal brain activity profiles. Numerous clustering algorithms are available, and no one method is optimal for all areas of application because an algorithm's performance depends on specific characteristics of the data. K-means and fuzzy clustering are popular for neuroimaging analyses, and select hierarchical procedures also appear in the literature. It is unclear which clustering methods perform best for neuroimaging data. We conduct a simulation study, based on PET neuroimaging data, to evaluate the performances of several clustering algorithms, including a new procedure that builds on the kth nearest neighbor method. We also examine three stopping rules that assist in determining the optimal number of clusters. Five hierarchical clustering algorithms perform best in our study, some of which are new to neuroimaging analyses, with Ward's and the beta-flexible methods exhibiting the strongest performances. Furthermore, Ward's and the beta-flexible methods yield the best performances for noisy data, and the popular K-means and fuzzy clustering procedures also perform reasonably well. The stopping rules also exhibit good performances for the top five clustering algorithms, and the pseudo-T2 and pseudo-F stopping rules are superior for noisy data. Based on our simulations for both noisy and unscaled PET neuroimaging data, we recommend the combined use of the pseudo-F or pseudo-T2 stopping rule along with either Ward's or the beta-flexible clustering algorithm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15340933      PMCID: PMC6871981          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  12 in total

1.  A hierarchical clustering method for analyzing functional MR images.

Authors:  P Filzmoser; R Baumgartner; E Moser
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Comparison of two exploratory data analysis methods for fMRI: fuzzy clustering vs. principal component analysis.

Authors:  R Baumgartner; L Ryner; W Richter; R Summers; M Jarmasz; R Somorjai
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  On the number of clusters and the fuzziness index for unsupervised FCA application to BOLD fMRI time series.

Authors:  M J Fadili; S Ruan; D Bloyet; B Mazoyer
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  On clustering fMRI time series.

Authors:  C Goutte; P Toft; E Rostrup; F Nielsen; L K Hansen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  A multistep unsupervised fuzzy clustering analysis of fMRI time series.

Authors:  M J Fadili; S Ruan; D Bloyet; B Mazoyer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Cluster analysis of activity-time series in motor learning.

Authors:  Daniela Balslev; Finn A Nielsen; Sally A Frutiger; John J Sidtis; Torben B Christiansen; Claus Svarer; Stephen C Strother; David A Rottenberg; Lars K Hansen; Olaf B Paulson; I Law
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Feature-space clustering for fMRI meta-analysis.

Authors:  C Goutte; L K Hansen; M G Liptrot; E Rostrup
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Dynamical cluster analysis of cortical fMRI activation.

Authors:  A Baune; F T Sommer; M Erb; D Wildgruber; B Kardatzki; G Palm; W Grodd
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Multicontext fuzzy clustering for separation of brain tissues in magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Chaozhe Zhu; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Hierarchical clustering to measure connectivity in fMRI resting-state data.

Authors:  Dietmar Cordes; Vic Haughton; John D Carew; Konstantinos Arfanakis; Ken Maravilla
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Statistical approaches to functional neuroimaging data.

Authors:  F Dubois Bowman; Ying Guo; Gordana Derado
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.264

2.  Modeling dose-dependent neural processing responses using mixed effects spline models: with application to a PET study of ethanol.

Authors:  Ying Guo; F DuBois Bowman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Evaluating Functional Autocorrelation within Spatially Distributed Neural Processing Networks.

Authors:  Gordana Derado; F Dubois Bowman; Timothy D Ely; Clinton D Kilts
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 0.582

4.  A weighted cluster kernel PCA prediction model for multi-subject brain imaging data.

Authors:  Ying Guo
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 0.582

5.  Determining functional connectivity using fMRI data with diffusion-based anatomical weighting.

Authors:  F DuBois Bowman; Lijun Zhang; Gordana Derado; Shuo Chen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Adaptively and spatially estimating the hemodynamic response functions in fMRI.

Authors:  Jiaping Wang; Hongtu Zhu; Jianqing Fan; Kelly Giovanello; Weili Lin
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2011

7.  Brain Imaging Analysis.

Authors:  F Dubois Bowman
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.810

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.