Immunoarchitecture and specific functions of splenic autotransplants at different implantation sites.

The present study deals with the morphological and functional development of intraomentally and subcutaneously implanted splenic tissue. Spleens and splenic transplants from 138 Lewis rats were investigated with immunohistological, immunological and molecular biological methods at different times after operation (up to 200 days postoperatively). The analysis of the development revealed a nonsignificant reduction concerning the weight of subcutaneous replants and a nonsignificant decrease of the weight of female transplants of both groups at different phases after operation. The cell composition of cell suspensions from spleen and both transplant types showed a deficiency of T, B, MHC-I+ cells and a certain macrophage subset (ED-3+ cells) in transplants. In a quantitative immunohistological analysis of compartments (red pulp, periarteriolar lymphoid sheaths, marginal zone and follicles) the T cell reduction was related to the Tsupp/cyt cells and T cell receptor bearing cells in the periarteriolar lymphoid sheaths, whereas the density of T helper cells was normal. In addition, a different homing of kappa-light chain positive and leukocyte common antigen (B cell type)-positive B cells in follicles and marginal zone was detected. The amount of two macrophage subsets (ED-1+ and ED-2+ cells) was increased in the red pulp. Only minor differences in the immunoarchitecture of transplants at different implantation sites were measured. A functional analysis of spleen compared to both transplant groups elicited a B cell defect after LPS stimulation in subcutaneous transplants and a reduced allogeneic response of both transplant types but a normal proliferation of T cells after ConA stimulation and a correct IgM antibody response against sheep red blood cells. The in vivo mRNA expression and the expression kinetics of interferon-gamma and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after antigen stimulation differed in both transplant groups with a remarkable permanent expression of both mediators in subcutaneous transplants. It can be summarized that the results clearly indicate a development of spleen-like immunoarchitecture of intraomental replants with subtle cellular, functional and molecular alterations. In contrast, despite a comparable development, some severe functional defects occurred in subcutaneous implants pointing out the important role of interactions between the regenerating splenic tissue and the target tissue on a functional and molecular level.