Literature DB >> 15340091

Low sodium haemodialysis reduces interdialytic fluid consumption but paradoxically increases post-dialysis thirst.

Alister Oliver1, Mark Wright, Andrew Matson, Graham Woodrow, Neil King, Louise Dye.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) can be reduced by lowering the dialysate sodium concentration ([Na]) in haemodialysis patients. It has been assumed that this is because thirst is reduced, although this has been difficult to prove. We compared thirst patterns in stable haemodialysis patients with high and low IDWG using a novel technique and compared the effect of low sodium dialysis (LSD) with normal sodium dialysis (NSD).
METHODS: Eight patients with initial high IDWG and seven with low IDWG completed hourly visual analogue ratings of thirst using a modified palmtop computer during the dialysis day and the interdialytic day. The dialysate [Na] was progressively reduced by up to 5 mmol/l over five treatments. Dialysis continued at the lowest attained [Na] for 2 weeks and the measurements were repeated. The dialysate [Na] then returned to baseline and the process was repeated.
RESULTS: Baseline interdialytic day mean thirst was higher than the dialysis day mean for the high IDWG group (49.9+/-14.0 vs 36.2+/-16.6) and higher than the low weight gain group (49.9+/-14.0 vs 34.1+/-14.6). This trend persisted on LSD, but there was a pronounced increase in post-dialysis thirst scores for both groups (high IDWG: 46+/-13 vs 30+/-21; low IDWG: 48+/-24 vs 33+/-18). The high IDWG group demonstrated lower IDWG during LSD than NSD (2.23+/-0.98 vs 2.86+/-0.38 kg; P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that patients with high IDWG experience more intense feelings of thirst on the interdialytic day. LSD reduces their IDWG, but paradoxically increases thirst in the immediate post-dialysis period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15340091     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfh427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  2 in total

1.  Patient-stated preferences regarding volume-related risk mitigation strategies for hemodialysis.

Authors:  Jennifer E Flythe; Thomas W Mangione; Steven M Brunelli; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Determinants of thirst distress in patients on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Belgüzar Kara
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.370

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.