BACKGROUND: Glucose deprivation, a feature of poorly vascularized solid tumors, activates the unfolded protein response (UPR), a stress-signaling pathway, in tumor cells. We recently isolated a novel macrocyclic compound, versipelostatin (VST), that inhibits transcription from the promoter of GRP78, a gene that is activated as part of the UPR. We examined the effect of VST on the UPR induced by glucose deprivation or other stressors and on tumor growth in vivo. METHODS: Human colon cancer HT-29, fibrosarcoma HT1080, and stomach cancer MKN74 cells were cultured in the absence of glucose or in the presence of glucose and a UPR-inducing chemical stressor (the N-glycosylation inhibitor tunicamycin, the calcium ionophore A23187, or the hypoglycemia-mimicking agent 2-deoxyglucose [2DG]). The effect of VST on UPR induction was determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and immunoblot analysis of the UPR target genes GRP78 and GRP94; by immunoblot analysis of the UPR transcriptional activators ATF6, XBP1, and ATF4; and by analyzing reporter gene expression in cells transiently transfected with a GRP78 promoter-reporter gene. Cell sensitivity to VST was examined with a colony formation assay and flow cytometry. In vivo antitumor activity of VST was assessed with an MKN74 xenograft model. RESULTS: VST inhibited expression of UPR target genes in glucose-deprived or 2DG-treated cells but not in cells treated with tunicamycin or A23187. VST also inhibited the production of the UPR transcriptional activators XBP1 and ATF4 during glucose deprivation. The UPR-inhibitory action of VST was seen only in conditions of glucose deprivation and caused selective and massive killing of the glucose-deprived cells. VST alone and in combination with cisplatin statistically significantly (P =.004 and P<.001 for comparisons with untreated control, respectively) inhibited tumor growth of MKN74 xenografts. CONCLUSION: Disruption of the UPR may provide a novel therapeutic approach to targeting glucose-deprived solid tumors.
BACKGROUND:Glucose deprivation, a feature of poorly vascularized solid tumors, activates the unfolded protein response (UPR), a stress-signaling pathway, in tumor cells. We recently isolated a novel macrocyclic compound, versipelostatin (VST), that inhibits transcription from the promoter of GRP78, a gene that is activated as part of the UPR. We examined the effect of VST on the UPR induced by glucose deprivation or other stressors and on tumor growth in vivo. METHODS:Humancolon cancer HT-29, fibrosarcoma HT1080, and stomach cancer MKN74 cells were cultured in the absence of glucose or in the presence of glucose and a UPR-inducing chemical stressor (the N-glycosylation inhibitor tunicamycin, the calcium ionophore A23187, or the hypoglycemia-mimicking agent 2-deoxyglucose [2DG]). The effect of VST on UPR induction was determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and immunoblot analysis of the UPR target genes GRP78 and GRP94; by immunoblot analysis of the UPR transcriptional activators ATF6, XBP1, and ATF4; and by analyzing reporter gene expression in cells transiently transfected with a GRP78 promoter-reporter gene. Cell sensitivity to VST was examined with a colony formation assay and flow cytometry. In vivo antitumor activity of VST was assessed with an MKN74 xenograft model. RESULTS:VST inhibited expression of UPR target genes in glucose-deprived or 2DG-treated cells but not in cells treated with tunicamycin or A23187. VST also inhibited the production of the UPR transcriptional activators XBP1 and ATF4 during glucose deprivation. The UPR-inhibitory action of VST was seen only in conditions of glucose deprivation and caused selective and massive killing of the glucose-deprived cells. VST alone and in combination with cisplatin statistically significantly (P =.004 and P<.001 for comparisons with untreated control, respectively) inhibited tumor growth of MKN74 xenografts. CONCLUSION: Disruption of the UPR may provide a novel therapeutic approach to targeting glucose-deprived solid tumors.
Authors: Hui Wang; Dan Li; Shuanglong Liu; Ren Liu; Hong Yuan; Valery Krasnoperov; Hong Shan; Peter S Conti; Parkash S Gill; Zibo Li Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: James L Rubenstein; Jane Fridlyand; Arthur Shen; Ken Aldape; David Ginzinger; Tracy Batchelor; Patrick Treseler; Mitchel Berger; Michael McDermott; Michael Prados; Jon Karch; Craig Okada; William Hyun; Seema Parikh; Chris Haqq; Marc Shuman Journal: Blood Date: 2006-01-17 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jennifer J Wolfson; Kerrie L May; Cheleste M Thorpe; Dakshina M Jandhyala; James C Paton; Adrienne W Paton Journal: Cell Microbiol Date: 2008-04-21 Impact factor: 3.715
Authors: Paul Mellor; Leah Deibert; Brian Calvert; Keith Bonham; Svein A Carlsen; Deborah H Anderson Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 4.272