Literature DB >> 15339946

Ground reaction forces in horses trotting up an incline and on the level over a range of speeds.

Darren J Dutto1, Donald F Hoyt, Edward A Cogger, Steven J Wickler.   

Abstract

Although the forces required to support the body mass are not elevated when moving up an incline, kinematic studies, in vivo tendon and bone studies and kinetic studies suggest there is a shift in forces from the fore- to the hindlimbs in quadrupeds. However, there are no whole-animal kinetic measurements of incline locomotion. Based on previous related research, we hypothesized that there would be a shift in forces to the hindlimb. The present study measured the force produced by the fore- and hindlimbs of horses while trotting over a range of speeds (2.5 to 5 m s(-1)) on both level and up an inclined (10%) surface. On the level, forelimb peak forces increased with trotting speed, but hindlimb peak force remained constant. On the incline, both fore- and hindlimb peak forces increased with speed, but the sum of the peak forces was lower than on the level. On the level, over the range of speeds tested, total force was consistently distributed between the limbs as 57% forelimb and 43% hindlimb, similar to the weight distribution of the horses during static weight tests. On the incline, the force distribution during locomotion shifted to 52% forelimb and 48% hindlimb. Time of contact and duty factor decreased with speed for both limbs. Time of contact was longer for the forelimb than the hindlimb, a finding not previously reported for quadrupeds. Time of contact of both limbs tended to be longer when traveling up the incline than on the level, but duty factor for both limbs was similar under both conditions. Duty factor decreased slightly with increased speed for the hindlimb on the level, and the corresponding small, predicted increase in peak vertical force could not be detected statistically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15339946     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  15 in total

1.  Compliance, actuation, and work characteristics of the goat foreleg and hindleg during level, uphill, and downhill running.

Authors:  David V Lee; M Polly McGuigan; Edwin H Yoo; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2007-10-18

2.  How do the substrate reaction forces acting on a gecko's limbs respond to inclines?

Authors:  Zhouyi Wang; Zhendong Dai; Wei Li; Aihong Ji; Wenbao Wang
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2015-02-03

3.  Characterization and validation of a split belt treadmill for measuring hindlimb ground-reaction forces in able-bodied and spinalized felines.

Authors:  Marko Dimiskovski; Richard Scheinfield; Dwight Higgin; Alexander Krupka; Michel A Lemay
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Speed and incline during thoroughbred horse racing: racehorse speed supports a metabolic power constraint to incline running but not to decline running.

Authors:  Z T Self; A J Spence; A M Wilson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-06-07

5.  Fore-Aft Asymmetry Improves the Stability of Trotting in the Transverse Plane: A Modeling Study.

Authors:  Mau Adachi; Shinya Aoi; Tomoya Kamimura; Kazuo Tsuchiya; Fumitoshi Matsuno
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-03

6.  Control of Mammalian Locomotion by Somatosensory Feedback.

Authors:  Alain Frigon; Turgay Akay; Boris I Prilutsky
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 8.915

7.  Modulation of joint moments and work in the goat hindlimb with locomotor speed and surface grade.

Authors:  Allison S Arnold; David V Lee; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Mono- versus biarticular muscle function in relation to speed and gait changes: in vivo analysis of the goat triceps brachii.

Authors:  Andrew M Carroll; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  The metabolic cost of walking on an incline in the Peacock (Pavo cristatus).

Authors:  Holly Wilkinson; Nathan Thavarajah; Jonathan Codd
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Comparative anatomy and muscle architecture of selected hind limb muscles in the Quarter Horse and Arab.

Authors:  T C Crook; S E Cruickshank; C M McGowan; N Stubbs; J M Wakeling; A M Wilson; R C Payne
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.