Literature DB >> 15339629

Effects of data structure on the estimation of covariance functions to describe genotype by environment interactions in a reaction norm model.

Mario P L Calus1, Piter Bijma, Roel F Veerkamp.   

Abstract

Covariance functions have been proposed to predict breeding values and genetic (co)variances as a function of phenotypic within herd-year averages (environmental parameters) to include genotype by environment interaction. The objective of this paper was to investigate the influence of definition of environmental parameters and non-random use of sires on expected breeding values and estimated genetic variances across environments. Breeding values were simulated as a linear function of simulated herd effects. The definition of environmental parameters hardly influenced the results. In situations with random use of sires, estimated genetic correlations between the trait expressed in different environments were 0.93, 0.93 and 0.97 while simulated at 0.89 and estimated genetic variances deviated up to 30% from the simulated values. Non random use of sires, poor genetic connectedness and small herd size had a large impact on the estimated covariance functions, expected breeding values and calculated environmental parameters. Estimated genetic correlations between a trait expressed in different environments were biased upwards and breeding values were more biased when genetic connectedness became poorer and herd composition more diverse. The best possible solution at this stage is to use environmental parameters combining large numbers of animals per herd, while losing some information on genotype by environment interaction in the data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15339629      PMCID: PMC2697189          DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-36-5-489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Sel Evol        ISSN: 0999-193X            Impact factor:   4.297


(To access the full article, please see PDF)
  11 in total

1.  Reaction norm for yearling weight in beef cattle using single-step genomic evaluation.

Authors:  D P Oliveira; D A L Lourenco; S Tsuruta; I Misztal; D J A Santos; F R de Araújo Neto; R R Aspilcueta-Borquis; F Baldi; R Carvalheiro; G M F de Camargo; L G Albuquerque; H Tonhati
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Macro-environmental sensitivity for growth rate in Danish Duroc pigs is under genetic control.

Authors:  Mette D Madsen; Per Madsen; Bjarne Nielsen; Torsten N Kristensen; Just Jensen; Mahmoud Shirali
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Enviromics in breeding: applications and perspectives on envirotypic-assisted selection.

Authors:  Rafael T Resende; Hans-Peter Piepho; Guilherme J M Rosa; Orzenil B Silva-Junior; Fabyano F E Silva; Marcos Deon V de Resende; Dario Grattapaglia
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Genotype by environment interaction for 450-day weight of Nelore cattle analyzed by reaction norm models.

Authors:  Newton T Pégolo; Henrique N Oliveira; Lúcia G Albuquerque; Luiz Antonio F Bezerra; Raysildo B Lôbo
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 1.771

5.  Genetics of ascites resistance and tolerance in chicken: a random regression approach.

Authors:  Antti Kause; Sacha van Dalen; Henk Bovenhuis
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Association between age at first calving, first lactation traits and lifetime productivity in Murrah buffaloes.

Authors:  P Tamboli; A Bharadwaj; A Chaurasiya; Y C Bangar; A Jerome
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2022-01-05

7.  Estimation of genetic variance for macro- and micro-environmental sensitivity using double hierarchical generalized linear models.

Authors:  Han A Mulder; Lars Rönnegård; W Freddy Fikse; Roel F Veerkamp; Erling Strandberg
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  No direct by maternal effects interaction detected for pre-weaning growth in Romane sheep using a reaction norm model.

Authors:  Ingrid David; Frédéric Bouvier; Edmond Ricard; Julien Ruesche; Jean-Louis Weisbecker
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Use of multi-trait and random regression models to identify genetic variation in tolerance to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Authors:  Graham Lough; Hamed Rashidi; Ilias Kyriazakis; Jack C M Dekkers; Andrew Hess; Melanie Hess; Nader Deeb; Antti Kause; Joan K Lunney; Raymond R R Rowland; Han A Mulder; Andrea Doeschl-Wilson
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  The genetic analysis of tolerance to infections: a review.

Authors:  Antti Kause; Jørgen Odegård
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.