Literature DB >> 15339294

Optimal conditional error functions for the control of conditional power.

Werner Brannath1, Peter Bauer.   

Abstract

Ethical considerations and the competitive environment of clinical trials usually require that any given trial have sufficient power to detect a treatment advance. If at an interim analysis the available data are used to decide whether the trial is promising enough to be continued, investigators and sponsors often wish to have a high conditional power, which is the probability to reject the null hypothesis given the interim data and the alternative of interest. Under this requirement a design with interim sample size recalculation, which keeps the overall and conditional power at a prespecified value and preserves the overall type I error rate, is a reasonable alternative to a classical group sequential design, in which the conditional power is often too small. In this article two-stage designs with control of overall and conditional power are constructed that minimize the expected sample size, either for a simple point alternative or for a random mixture of alternatives given by a prior density for the efficacy parameter. The presented optimality result applies to trials with and without an interim hypothesis test; in addition, one can account for constraints such as a minimal sample size for the second stage. The optimal designs will be illustrated with an example, and will be compared to the frequently considered method of using the conditional type I error level of a group sequential design.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15339294     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00221.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  3 in total

1.  Twenty-five years of confirmatory adaptive designs: opportunities and pitfalls.

Authors:  Peter Bauer; Frank Bretz; Vladimir Dragalin; Franz König; Gernot Wassmer
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Adaptive designs based on the truncated product method.

Authors:  Markus Neuhäuser; Frank Bretz
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Conditional power and friends: The why and how of (un)planned, unblinded sample size recalculations in confirmatory trials.

Authors:  Kevin Kunzmann; Michael J Grayling; Kim May Lee; David S Robertson; Kaspar Rufibach; James M S Wason
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.497

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.