Literature DB >> 1533864

[Complications of gynecologic laparoscopy. Multicentric study of 7,604 laparoscopies].

C Chapron1, D Querleu, G Mage, P Madelenat, J B Dubuisson, A Audebert, R Erny, M A Bruhat.   

Abstract

In a series of 7,604 laparoscopic procedures, the authors report one death and a rate of 2.76 per thousand (21 cases) for complications requiring laparotomy. When exclusively diagnostic laparoscopic procedures are considered (1,191 cases) this rate drops to 1.67 per thousand. The likelihood of laparotomy being required is directly related to the degree of importance of the laparoscopic surgical procedure. For major laparoscopic surgery the rate of laparotomy is 4.46 per thousand (18 cases), whereas it is only 0.42 per thousand (1 case) for minor laparoscopic surgery (p less than 0.01). Intestinal injuries represent 52.4% (11 out of 21) of cases requiring laparotomy. The main problem with this type of accident is to recognize them, because in almost half the cases (42.8%; 3 out of 7) the intestinal injury went unseen during the laparoscopic procedure and gave rise to peritonitis. Vascular complications are less frequent and required laparotomy in only 8 cases (38%; 8 out of 21). This low level of complications is yet further proof that laparoscopic surgery is a reliable technique and does not involve a high risk of laparotomy, provided that the surgeon has received specific training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1533864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)        ISSN: 0150-9918


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Patient preparation and technical infrastructure in celioscopy].

Authors:  E Chardonnens; S Spuhler; P Sauthier; P De Grandi
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Clinical and laboratory evaluation of an electrosurgical laparoscopic trocar.

Authors:  K Waxman; D H Birkett; J M Sackier; J Este-McDonald; J Duquette
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Functional outcomes of surgical treatment of ureteral injury following gynecological and obstetrical surgery.

Authors:  Moez Rahoui; Yassine Ouanes; Kays Chaker; Kheireddine Mourad Dali; Mokhtar Bibi; Ahmed Sellami; Sami Ben Rhouma; Yassine Nouira
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 4.  Laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical guideline, national survey, and medicolegal ramifications.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh K Gupta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Techniques for laparoscopic repair of major intraoperative vascular injury: case reports and review of literature.

Authors:  Mehraneh D Jafari; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Gastrointestinal complications of laparoscopic/robot-assisted urologic surgery and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Mert Ali Karadag; Kursat Cecen; Aslan Demir; Murat Bagcioglu; Ramazan Kocaaslan; Teoman Cem Kadioglu
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2015-02-09

7.  Laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment in gynecologic emergencies.

Authors:  Salvador Navarrete Aulestia; Héctor Cantele; José Luis Leyba; Manuel Navarrete; Salvador Navarrete Llopla
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  [Ureteral injuries complicating gynecologic surgery].

Authors:  Fatnassi Ridha; Merzougui Latifa; Rebhi Ines; Hajji Maamar; Braiek Salem
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2018-06-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.