Literature DB >> 1533860

A myoelectrically based dynamic three-dimensional model to predict loads on lumbar spine tissues during lateral bending.

S M McGill1.   

Abstract

This work describes a dynamic model of the low back that incorporates extensive anatomical detail of the musculo-ligamentous-skeletal system to predict the load time histories of individual tissues. The dynamic reaction moment about L4/L5 was determined during lateral bending from a linked-segment model. This reaction moment was partitioned into restorative components provided by the disc, ligament strain, and active-muscle contraction using a second model of the spine that incorporated a detailed representation of the anatomy. Muscle contraction forces were estimated using both information from surface electromyograms, collected from 12 sites, and consideration of the modulating effects of muscle length, cross-sectional area and passive elasticity. This modelling technique is sensitive to the different ways in which individuals recruit their musculature to satisfy moment constraints. Time histories of muscle forces are provided. High muscle loads are consistent with the common clinical observation of muscle strain often produced by load handling. Furthermore, the coactivation measured in muscles on both sides of the trunk suggests that muscles are recruited to satisfy the lateral bending reaction torque in addition to performing other mechanical roles such as spine stabilization. If an estimate of the intervertebral joint compression is desired for assessment of lateral bends in industry, then a single equivalent lateral muscle with a moment arm of approximately 3.0-4.0 cm would conservatively capture the effects of muscle co-contraction quantified in this study.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1533860     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90259-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  15 in total

1.  Modelling the masticatory biomechanics of a pig.

Authors:  G E J Langenbach; F Zhang; S W Herring; A G Hannam
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method.

Authors:  Balkan Cakir; Marcus Richter; Wolfhart Puhl; René Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Trunk biomechanical models based on equilibrium at a single-level violate equilibrium at other levels.

Authors:  N Arjmand; A Shirazi-Adl; M Parnianpour
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The effects of trunk stiffness on postural control during unstable seated balance.

Authors:  N Peter Reeves; Vanessa Q Everding; Jacek Cholewicki; David C Morrisette
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effect of background muscle activity on computerized detection of sEMG onset and offset.

Authors:  Angela S Lee; Jacek Cholewicki; N Peter Reeves
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Mechanically corrected EMG for the continuous estimation of erector spinae muscle loading during repetitive lifting.

Authors:  J R Potvin; R W Norman; S M McGill
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

7.  Isovelocity investigation of the lengthening behaviour of the erector spinae muscles.

Authors:  C G Sutarno; S M McGill
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1995

8.  In vivo measurement of implant loads in a patient with a fractured vertebral body.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; G Bergmann; F Graichen; U Weber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Trunk muscle activity during bridging exercises on and off a Swiss ball.

Authors:  Gregory J Lehman; Wajid Hoda; Steven Oliver
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2005-07-30

10.  Shake a tail feather: the evolution of the theropod tail into a stiff aerodynamic surface.

Authors:  Michael Pittman; Stephen M Gatesy; Paul Upchurch; Anjali Goswami; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.