Literature DB >> 15336886

Heavy metals in recovered fines from construction and demolition debris recycling facilities in Florida.

Timothy Townsend1, Thabet Tolaymat, Kevin Leo, Jenna Jambeck.   

Abstract

A major product recovered from the processing and recycling of construction and demolition (C&D) debris is screened soil, also referred to as fines. A proposed reuse option for C&D debris fines is fill material, typically in construction projects as a substitute for natural soil. Waste material that is reused in a manner similar to soil must first be characterized to examine potential risks to human health and the environment. In Florida, samples of C&D debris fines from 13 C&D debris recycling facilities were characterized for 11 total and leachable heavy metal concentrations. Total metal concentration results (mg/kg) were compared to existing data on background Florida soil concentrations and to Florida's risk-based soil cleanup target levels (SCTLs). All of the detected metals were found to be elevated with respect to background. The 95% upper confidence level of arsenic from 99 samples was 3.2 mg/kg; arsenic presented the greatest limitation to reuse when compared to the SCTLs. Lead was not found to pose a major problem, likely because of the relatively new building infrastructure in Florida, which results in less demolition debris and less material impacted by lead-based paint. The results of batch leaching tests conducted using simulated rainwater (mg/l) were compared directly to risk-based groundwater levels for Florida and were found not to pose a risk using existing risk assessment policies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15336886     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  7 in total

1.  Characterizing the environmental impact of metals in construction and demolition waste.

Authors:  Danfeng Yu; Huabo Duan; Qingbin Song; Xiaoyue Li; Hao Zhang; Hui Zhang; Yicheng Liu; Weijun Shen; Jinben Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Does Disposing of Construction and Demolition Debris in Unlined Landfills Impact Groundwater Quality? Evidence from 91 Landfill Sites in Florida.

Authors:  Jon T Powell; Pradeep Jain; Justin Smith; Timothy G Townsend; Thabet M Tolaymat
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Characterization of wastes from construction and demolition sector.

Authors:  Swarnalatha Somasundaram; Tae-Wan Jeon; Young-Yeul Kang; Woo-Il Kim; Seong-Kyeong Jeong; Yong-Jun Kim; Jin-Mo Yeon; Sun Kyoung Shin
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Characterization and environmental risk assessment of heavy metals in construction and demolition wastes from five sources (chemical, metallurgical and light industries, and residential and recycled aggregates).

Authors:  Xiaofeng Gao; Yilu Gu; Tian Xie; Guangyin Zhen; Sheng Huang; Youcai Zhao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  The contents and release behavior of heavy metals in construction and demolition waste used in freeway construction.

Authors:  Yuyun Chen; Yiqiang Zhou
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Distribution of Major and Trace Elements in a Tropical Hydroelectric Reservoir in Sarawak, Malaysia.

Authors:  Siong Fong Sim; Teck Yee Ling; Lee Nyanti; Terri Zhuan Ean Lee; Nurul Aida Lu Mohd Irwan Lu; Tomy Bakeh
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2014-09-21

7.  Construction and demolition waste as recycled aggregate for environmentally friendly concrete paving.

Authors:  Manuel Contreras Llanes; Maximina Romero Pérez; Manuel Jesús Gázquez González; Juan Pedro Bolívar Raya
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.223

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.