PURPOSE: Mandible fractures are among the most frequently seen injuries in the trauma center setting. Recent shifts in the mechanism and age distribution of patients sustaining these injuries are well documented. This study attempts to define current, predictable patterns of fracture based on patient characteristics and mechanism of injury. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The charts of 134 patients with 225 mandible fractures treated over a 7-year period by the Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery services, our institution, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized based on age, mechanism of fracture, and anatomic location of fracture. Multivariate analysis of data was performed to determine significant relationships among groups. RESULTS: Violent crimes such as assault and gunshot wounds accounted for the majority of fractures (50%) in this study, with motor vehicle accidents less likely (29%). Overall, parasymphyseal fractures were most frequent (35%), whereas angle and body fractures were also common (15% and 21%, respectively). There was a statistically significant association of motor vehicle accidents with parasymphyseal fractures (45%), and gunshot wounds with body fractures (36%), whereas assault victims had a higher than predicted frequency of angle fractures (27%) and fewer parasymphyseal fractures (19%). Patients aged 17 to 30 were more likely to suffer from gunshot wounds, whereas older adults (age 31-50) were more likely to be assault victims. Patients over age 50 suffered fractures from falls at a higher than expected rate. Although children and young adults seemed to suffer more parasymphyseal fractures and older adults body fractures, these correlations failed to show statistical significance. Parasymphyseal fractures were most frequently associated with fractures at other sites within the mandible, ipsilateral body fractures being the most common. CONCLUSIONS: Updated data on the association of patient age and mechanism of injury with fracture pattern can guide treating physicians in anticipating and diagnosing traumatic mandible fractures.
PURPOSE: Mandible fractures are among the most frequently seen injuries in the trauma center setting. Recent shifts in the mechanism and age distribution of patients sustaining these injuries are well documented. This study attempts to define current, predictable patterns of fracture based on patient characteristics and mechanism of injury. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The charts of 134 patients with 225 mandible fractures treated over a 7-year period by the Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery services, our institution, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized based on age, mechanism of fracture, and anatomic location of fracture. Multivariate analysis of data was performed to determine significant relationships among groups. RESULTS: Violent crimes such as assault and gunshot wounds accounted for the majority of fractures (50%) in this study, with motor vehicle accidents less likely (29%). Overall, parasymphyseal fractures were most frequent (35%), whereas angle and body fractures were also common (15% and 21%, respectively). There was a statistically significant association of motor vehicle accidents with parasymphyseal fractures (45%), and gunshot wounds with body fractures (36%), whereas assault victims had a higher than predicted frequency of angle fractures (27%) and fewer parasymphyseal fractures (19%). Patients aged 17 to 30 were more likely to suffer from gunshot wounds, whereas older adults (age 31-50) were more likely to be assault victims. Patients over age 50 suffered fractures from falls at a higher than expected rate. Although children and young adults seemed to suffer more parasymphyseal fractures and older adults body fractures, these correlations failed to show statistical significance. Parasymphyseal fractures were most frequently associated with fractures at other sites within the mandible, ipsilateral body fractures being the most common. CONCLUSIONS: Updated data on the association of patient age and mechanism of injury with fracture pattern can guide treating physicians in anticipating and diagnosing traumatic mandible fractures.