Literature DB >> 15333635

Promiscuous target interactions in the mariner transposon Himar1.

Karen Lipkow1, Nicolas Buisine, Ronald Chalmers.   

Abstract

We have previously characterized the early intermediates of mariner transposition. Here we characterize the target interactions that occur later in the reaction. We find that, in contrast to the early transposition intermediates, the strand transfer complex is extremely stable and difficult to disassemble. Transposase is tightly bound to the transposon ends constraining rotation of the DNA at the single strand gaps in the target site flanking the element on either side. We also find that although the cleavage step requires Mg2+ or Mn2+ as cofactor, the strand transfer step is also supported by Ca2+, suggesting that the structure of the active site changes between cleavage and insertion. Finally, we show that, in contrast to the bacterial cut and paste transposons, mariner target interactions are promiscuous and can take place either before or after cleavage of the flanking DNA. This is similar to the behavior of the V(D)J system, which is believed to be derived from an ancestral eukaryotic transposon. We discuss the implications of promiscuous target interactions for promoting local transposition and whether this is an adaptation to facilitate the invasion of a genome following horizontal transfer to a new host species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15333635     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M408759200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  13 in total

1.  A simple topological filter in a eukaryotic transposon as a mechanism to suppress genome instability.

Authors:  Corentin Claeys Bouuaert; Danxu Liu; Ronald Chalmers
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  The human SETMAR protein preserves most of the activities of the ancestral Hsmar1 transposase.

Authors:  Danxu Liu; Julien Bischerour; Azeem Siddique; Nicolas Buisine; Yves Bigot; Ronald Chalmers
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Characterization of a Coxiella burnetii ftsZ mutant generated by Himar1 transposon mutagenesis.

Authors:  Paul A Beare; Dale Howe; Diane C Cockrell; Anders Omsland; Bryan Hansen; Robert A Heinzen
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  The bacterial Tn9 chloramphenicol resistance gene: an attractive DNA segment for Mos1 mariner insertions.

Authors:  Gwénaëlle Crénès; Dina Ivo; Joan Hérisson; Sarah Dion; Sylvaine Renault; Yves Bigot; Agnès Petit
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  Target capture during Mos1 transposition.

Authors:  Aude Pflieger; Jerôme Jaillet; Agnès Petit; Corinne Augé-Gouillou; Sylvaine Renault
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Gene therapy vectors: the prospects and potentials of the cut-and-paste transposons.

Authors:  Corentin Claeys Bouuaert; Ronald M Chalmers
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Site-directed integration of transgenes: transposons revisited using DNA-binding-domain technologies.

Authors:  Marie-Véronique Demattei; Xavier Thomas; Elodie Carnus; Corinne Augé-Gouillou; Sylvaine Renault
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Identification of multiple binding sites for the THAP domain of the Galileo transposase in the long terminal inverted-repeats.

Authors:  Mar Marzo; Danxu Liu; Alfredo Ruiz; Ronald Chalmers
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2013-05-04       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 9.  Delivering the goods: viral and non-viral gene therapy systems and the inherent limits on cargo DNA and internal sequences.

Authors:  Helen Atkinson; Ronald Chalmers
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 1.633

10.  Introducing simulated cellular architecture to the quantitative analysis of fluorescent microscopy.

Authors:  Mark A DePristo; Lynne Chang; Ronald D Vale; Shahid M Khan; Karen Lipkow
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.667

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.