Literature DB >> 15333543

Best evidence topic report. Wound closure in animal bites.

Freya Garbutt1, Rachel Jenner.   

Abstract

A short cut review was carried out to establish whether primary closure of animal bites increases wound infection rates. Altogether 74 papers were found using the reported search, of which one presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses of this best paper are tabulated. A clinical bottom line is stated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15333543      PMCID: PMC1726453          DOI: 10.1136/emj.2004.017962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  3 in total

1.  Thorough debridement and immediate primary wound closure for animal bite injuries of the upper limbs.

Authors:  K Naito; Y Sugiyama; Y Igeta; K Kaneko; O Obayashi
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  ​Primary closure versus delayed or no closure for traumatic wounds due to mammalian bite.

Authors:  Soumyadeep Bhaumik; Richard Kirubakaran; Sirshendu Chaudhuri
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-06

3.  Emergency treatment on facial laceration of dog bite wounds with immediate primary closure: a prospective randomized trial study.

Authors:  Chen Rui-feng; Huang Li-song; Zheng Ji-bo; Wang Li-qiu
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2013-07-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.