Literature DB >> 15333529

Non-touch suturing technique fails to reduce glove puncture rates in an accident and emergency department.

T K McAdam1, R E McLaughlin, B McNicholl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of introducing a safer non-touch suturing technique into an inner city emergency department.
METHODS: The rate of glove perforation, measured by electrical conductance, was used as a marker. Gloves (Bodyguards) used in suturing were collected over a two month period. Two half day suture workshops were then conducted in the emergency department and gloves were collected for a further two months. All doctors (14) were included in the study regardless of grade. Gloves were tested for perforation by electrical conductance.
RESULTS: There were 107 gloves and 19 perforations in the first group, 133 with 28 perforations in the second (p = 0.52), and one perforation in 100 control gloves. Most doctors reported inadvertent needlestick handling.
CONCLUSION: Two half day suturing workshops are not enough to reduce glove perforations from suturing in the emergency department. Difficulty with compliance suggests that safe suturing practice must be taught before doctors develop bad habits that are difficult to change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15333529      PMCID: PMC1726452          DOI: 10.1136/emj.2002.001461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  11 in total

1.  Detection of surgical glove integrity.

Authors:  R L Sohn; M T Murray; A Franko; P K Hwang; S A Dulchavsky; M J Grimm
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Intraoperative glove perforation--single versus double gloving in protection against skin contamination.

Authors:  S Thomas; M Agarwal; G Mehta
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Students sitting medical finals--ready to be house officers?

Authors:  P B Goodfellow; P Claydon
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Surgeon protection: early recognition of glove perforation using a green under glove.

Authors:  J N Brown
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1996-12

5.  Device-specific sharps injury and usage rates: an analysis by hospital department.

Authors:  N Patel; G H Tignor
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.918

6.  Surgical gloves as a mechanical barrier against human immunodeficiency viruses.

Authors:  A G Dalgleish; M Malkovsky
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Underreporting of needlestick injuries in a university hospital.

Authors:  B H Hamory
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 2.918

8.  Reduction in incidence of glove perforation during laparotomy wound closure by 'no touch' technique.

Authors:  M P Corlett; D W England; N L Kidner; A R Attard; I A Fraser
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 9.  Infections acquired during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: estimating the risk and defining strategies for prevention.

Authors:  G C Mejicano; D G Maki
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Under-reporting of contaminated needlestick injuries in emergency health care workers.

Authors:  D Tandberg; K K Stewart; D Doezema
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.721

View more
  1 in total

1.  Is the surgical knot tying technique associated with a risk for unnoticed glove perforation? An experimental study.

Authors:  Vincenzo Giordano; Hilton Augusto Koch; Juliano de Sousa Prado; Leonardo Schiavo de Morais; Rafael de Araújo Hara; Felipe Serrão de Souza; Ney Pecegueiro do Amaral
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2014-06-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.