Literature DB >> 15333405

Derivation of preliminary three-dimensional pharmacophores for nonhalogenated volatile anesthetics.

Jason C Sewell1, John W Sear.   

Abstract

We investigated the molecular basis for the immobilizing activity of nonhalogenated volatile anesthetics by using comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). In vivo potency data (expressed as minimum alveolar anesthetic concentrations) for 38 structurally diverse drugs were obtained from the literature. The anesthetics were randomly divided into a training-set (n = 28) used to formulate the activity models and a test-set (n = 10) used to independently assess the models' predictive power. The anesthetic structures were aligned to maximize their similarity in molecular shape and electrostatic potential to conformers of the most active drug in the group: hexanol. The individual conformers and alignments with maximum similarity (calculated with combined Carbo indices) were retained and used to derive the CoMFA activity models. The final CoMFA model explained 95.5% of the variance in the observed activities of the training-set anesthetics. The model had good predictive capability for both the training-set drugs (cross-validated r(2) = 0.824) and the randomly excluded test-set anesthetics (r(2) = 0.921). Pharmacophoric maps were derived by identifying the spatial distribution of key areas in which steric and electrostatic interactions are important in determining the immobilizing activity of the anesthetics considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15333405     DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000129978.92936.A2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  4 in total

1.  A comparison of the molecular bases for N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor inhibition versus immobilizing activities of volatile aromatic anesthetics.

Authors:  Jason C Sewell; Douglas E Raines; Edmond I Eger; Michael J Laster; John W Sear
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 2.  A hypothesis on the origin and evolution of the response to inhaled anesthetics.

Authors:  James M Sonner
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 3.  Is a new paradigm needed to explain how inhaled anesthetics produce immobility?

Authors:  Edmond I Eger; Douglas E Raines; Steven L Shafer; Hugh C Hemmings; James M Sonner
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  The biological and toxicological activity of gases and vapors.

Authors:  Michael H Abraham; Ricardo Sánchez-Moreno; Javier Gil-Lostes; William E Acree; J Enrique Cometto-Muñiz; William S Cain
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 3.500

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.