C French1, R J Rona, M Jones, S Wessely. 1. Department of Public Health Sciences, Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School Medicine, London.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify any potential barriers to the effectiveness of a military health screening programme based on the beliefs of British Service personnel. METHODS: As part of a pilot evaluation of the suitability of a new health screening questionnaire for the British Armed Forces, 73 men and women from the three Services, of various ranks and age, underwent a semi-structured interview after completing a screening questionnaire. Participants were asked about the veracity of their answers and their views regarding a screening questionnaire. Afterwards questionnaires were sent to 4496 randomly selected personnel from the three Services, which validated the main emerging themes. A constant comparative method of analysis was used to identify and categorise all ideas presented. RESULTS: The main barriers to health screening were lack of trust, perceived low quality of healthcare, and perceived lack of concern within the institution about work environments and home life. The central issue was 'confidence' in military health care provision. Screening was considered worthwhile, but many confided that they would not honestly answer some items in the questionnaire. Lack of trust in medical confidentiality, stigmatisation and fears that the process would jeopardise career prospects were stressed. Many Service personnel admitted to seeking medical help outside the Armed Forces. CONCLUSIONS: Concerns raised by Service personnel may endanger the value of a screening programme and the provision of health services. Greater emphasis needs to be placed upon gaining the confidence of those targeted for health screening.
OBJECTIVE: To identify any potential barriers to the effectiveness of a military health screening programme based on the beliefs of British Service personnel. METHODS: As part of a pilot evaluation of the suitability of a new health screening questionnaire for the British Armed Forces, 73 men and women from the three Services, of various ranks and age, underwent a semi-structured interview after completing a screening questionnaire. Participants were asked about the veracity of their answers and their views regarding a screening questionnaire. Afterwards questionnaires were sent to 4496 randomly selected personnel from the three Services, which validated the main emerging themes. A constant comparative method of analysis was used to identify and categorise all ideas presented. RESULTS: The main barriers to health screening were lack of trust, perceived low quality of healthcare, and perceived lack of concern within the institution about work environments and home life. The central issue was 'confidence' in military health care provision. Screening was considered worthwhile, but many confided that they would not honestly answer some items in the questionnaire. Lack of trust in medical confidentiality, stigmatisation and fears that the process would jeopardise career prospects were stressed. Many Service personnel admitted to seeking medical help outside the Armed Forces. CONCLUSIONS: Concerns raised by Service personnel may endanger the value of a screening programme and the provision of health services. Greater emphasis needs to be placed upon gaining the confidence of those targeted for health screening.
Authors: Matthew Gould; Amy Adler; Mark Zamorski; Carl Castro; Natalie Hanily; Nicole Steele; Steve Kearney; Neil Greenberg Journal: J R Soc Med Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Amelia K Searle; Miranda Van Hooff; Alexander C McFarlane; Christopher E Davies; A Kate Fairweather-Schmidt; Stephanie E Hodson; Helen Benassi; Nicole Steele Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2014-12-16 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Amy C Iversen; Lauren van Staden; Jamie Hacker Hughes; Tess Browne; Lisa Hull; John Hall; Neil Greenberg; Roberto J Rona; Matthew Hotopf; Simon Wessely; Nicola T Fear Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2009-10-30 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Amy C Iversen; Lauren van Staden; Jamie Hacker Hughes; Neil Greenberg; Matthew Hotopf; Roberto J Rona; Graham Thornicroft; Simon Wessely; Nicola T Fear Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Samantha Bull; Gursimran Thandi; Mary Keeling; Melanie Chesnokov; Neil Greenberg; Norman Jones; Roberto Rona; Stephani L Hatch Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 3.295