Literature DB >> 15332424

Older people's views about home as a place of care at the end of life.

Merryn Gott1, Jane Seymour, Gary Bellamy, David Clark, Sam Ahmedzai.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore the attitudes of older people towards home as a place of care when dying.
DESIGN: A two-phase qualitative study using focus groups and semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Eight focus group discussions were held with 32 participants recruited from six purposively selected community groups representing older people in Sheffield, UK. A further 16 men and 29 women participated in semi-structured interviews.
RESULTS: Participants identified that home was more than a physical location, representing familiarity, comfort and the presence of loved ones. While participants anticipated that home would be their ideal place of care during dying, practical and moral problems associated with it were recognised by many. Some had no informal carer. Others did not want to be a 'burden' to family and friends, or were worried about these witnessing their suffering. Those who had children did not wish them to deliver care that was unduly intimate. Concerns were expressed about the quality of care that could be delivered at home, particularly in relation to accommodating health technologies and providing adequate symptom relief. Worries were also expressed about those living in poor material circumstances. Mixed views were expressed about the presence of professional carers within the home. Although they were seen to provide much needed support for the informal carer, the presence of 'strangers' was regarded by some as intrusive and compromising the ideal of 'home'. DISCUSSION: Older people perceive factors they associate with 'home' as crucial to a good death, most notably presence of friends and family, but many anticipate that they would prefer to be cared for elsewhere when dying. These findings run counter to assumptions that the medicalised, institutional death cannot be a 'good death'. It is important that dying in hospital is not demonized, but rather efforts made to examine how institutional deaths can take on a more meaningful quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15332424     DOI: 10.1191/0269216304pm889oa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  65 in total

1.  Preferred place of care and place of death of the general public and cancer patients in Japan.

Authors:  Akemi Yamagishi; Tatsuya Morita; Mitsunori Miyashita; Saran Yoshida; Nobuya Akizuki; Yutaka Shirahige; Miki Akiyama; Kenji Eguchi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill patients with cancer: systematic review.

Authors:  Barbara Gomes; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-08

Review 3.  Choice and place of death: individual preferences, uncertainty, and the availability of care.

Authors:  Daniel Munday; Jeremy Dale; Scott Murray
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Place of death: how much does it matter? The priority is to improve end-of-life care in all settings.

Authors:  Stephen Barclay; Antony Arthur
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Place of death for the 'oldest old': > or =85-year-olds in the CC75C population-based cohort.

Authors:  Jane Fleming; Jun Zhao; Morag Farquhar; Carol Brayne; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  [Informal non-kin support for elderly people living alone and end of life care. Literature review].

Authors:  S Pleschberger; P Wosko
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 1.281

7.  Knowledge, beliefs, and concerns about opioids, palliative care, and homecare of advanced cancer patients: a nationwide survey in Japan.

Authors:  Miki Akiyama; Toru Takebayashi; Tatsuya Morita; Mitsunori Miyashita; Kei Hirai; Motohiro Matoba; Nobuya Akizuki; Yutaka Shirahige; Akemi Yamagishi; Kenji Eguchi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Fear of dying in an ethnically diverse society: cross-sectional studies of people aged 65+ in Britain.

Authors:  Ann Bowling; Steve Iliffe; Anthony Kessel; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.401

9.  Understanding and coping with diversity in healthcare.

Authors:  J Jhutti-Johal
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2013-09

10.  Patient preferences for future care--how can Advance Care Planning become embedded into dementia care: a study protocol.

Authors:  Louise Robinson; Claire Bamford; Fiona Beyer; Alexa Clark; Claire Dickinson; Charlotte Emmet; Catherine Exley; Julian Hughes; Lesley Robson; Nikki Rousseau
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.