Literature DB >> 15332092

Estrogen receptor-negative breast carcinomas: a review of morphology and immunophenotypical analysis.

Thomas C Putti1, Dalia M Abd El-Rehim, Emad A Rakha, Claire E Paish, Andrew H S Lee, Sarah E Pinder, Ian O Ellis.   

Abstract

Estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancers are a group of tumors with poor prognosis and fewer cancer prevention and treatment strategies compared to ER-positive tumors. The aim of this study was to assess the morphological characteristics and immunohistochemical profile of ER-negative tumors and thus to understand the biological behavior and unique nature. In total, 291 consecutive ER-negative cases available from our primary breast cancer series were examined. Hematoxylin- and eosin-stained sections of all the cases were studied for several morphological parameters and their immunophenotype profile. These findings were correlated with patient and tumor characteristics and survival data. ER-negative tumors constituted 30% of the primary operable breast cancer series. The majority of tumors were grade 3 (94%) and the commonest histological types were ductal/no specific type (85%), and atypical medullary carcinoma (8%). High-grade comedo-type necrosis, lymphoid stroma, central necrosis/fibrosis and pushing margins were the most common morphological features. The presence of a pushing margin showed a significant relation to androgen receptor negativity, absence of epidermal growth factor receptor expression and negative lymph nodes. Lymphoid stroma and comedo-necrosis correlated with higher tumor grade. ER-negative breast cancers are a distinct group of tumors with several common morphological features. Grade 3 histology, pushing margin, lymphoid stroma, comedo-type necrosis and central fibrosis/necrosis are the dominant morphological findings. The presence of a pushing margin appears to have a significant correlation with negative lymph node status. ER-negative tumors show a higher expression of p53, CerbB2 and epidermal growth factor receptor compared to ER-positive breast cancer. These unique features support the concept that ER-negative tumors are a morphologically and phenotypically distinct entity and provide a rationale for the study and use of newer promising agents in the treatment of ER-negative breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15332092     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  81 in total

1.  Beyond immune density: critical role of spatial heterogeneity in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Sidra Nawaz; Andreas Heindl; Konrad Koelble; Yinyin Yuan
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Can proton MRS provide useful information for characterizing estrogen receptor status in breast cancer?

Authors:  H-M Baek; J-H Chen; O Nalcioglu; M-Y Su
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Interaction of mammographic breast density with menopausal status and postmenopausal hormone use in relation to the risk of aggressive breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Rulla M Tamimi; Kimberly A Bertrand; Christopher G Scott; Matthew R Jensen; V Shane Pankratz; Kathy Brandt; Daniel Visscher; Aaron Norman; Fergus Couch; John Shepherd; Bo Fan; Yunn-Yi Chen; Lin Ma; Andrew H Beck; Steven R Cummings; Karla Kerlikowske; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Germline Variants Impact Somatic Events during Tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Johnny R Ramroop; Madelyn M Gerber; Amanda Ewart Toland
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  High expression of miR-21 in triple-negative breast cancers was correlated with a poor prognosis and promoted tumor cell in vitro proliferation.

Authors:  Guizhi Dong; Xiaoling Liang; Deguang Wang; Huiquan Gao; Ling Wang; Lili Wang; Jingjun Liu; Zhaohui Du
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Estrogen receptor and breast MR imaging features: a correlation study.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Hyeon-Man Baek; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Lympho-vascular invasion in BRCA related breast cancer compared to sporadic controls.

Authors:  Marise R Heerma van Voss; Petra van der Groep; Jos Bart; Elsken van der Wall; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Claudins 1, 3, and 4 protein expression in ER negative breast cancer correlates with markers of the basal phenotype.

Authors:  Anne A Blanchard; George P Skliris; Peter H Watson; Leigh C Murphy; Carla Penner; Ladislav Tomes; Tamara L Young; Etienne Leygue; Yvonne Myal
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  CD44+ cancer cells express higher levels of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 in breast tumours.

Authors:  Zahra Madjd; Ali Zare Mehrjerdi; Ali Mohammad Sharifi; Saadat Molanaei; Shahriar Zohourian Shahzadi; Mohsen Asadi-Lari
Journal:  Cancer Immun       Date:  2009-04-23

10.  Mutations in p53, p53 protein overexpression and breast cancer survival.

Authors:  Pavel Rossner; Marilie D Gammon; Yu-Jing Zhang; Mary Beth Terry; Hanina Hibshoosh; Lorenzo Memeo; Mahesh Mansukhani; Chang-Min Long; Gail Garbowski; Meenakshi Agrawal; Tara S Kalra; Mia M Gaudet; Susan L Teitelbaum; Alfred I Neugut; Regina M Santella
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 5.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.