STUDY OBJECTIVE: We characterize communication in an urban, academic medical center emergency department (ED) with regard to the timing and nature of the medical history survey and physical examination and discharge instructions. METHODS: Audiotaping and coding of 93 ED encounters (62 medical history surveys and physical examinations, 31 discharges) with a convenience sample of 24 emergency medicine residents, 8 nurses, and 93 nonemergency adult patients. RESULTS: Patients were 68% women and 84% black, with a mean age of 45 years. Emergency medicine providers were 70% men and 80% white. Of 62 medical history surveys and physical examinations, time spent on the introduction and medical history survey and physical examination averaged 7 minutes 31 seconds (range 1 to 20 minutes). Emergency medicine residents introduced themselves in only two thirds of encounters, rarely (8%) indicating their training status. Despite physician tendency (63%) to start with an open-ended question, only 20% of patients completed their presenting complaint without interruption. Average time to interruption (usually a closed question) was 12 seconds. Discharge instructions averaged 76 seconds (range 7 to 202 seconds). Information on diagnosis, expected course of illness, self-care, use of medications, time-specified follow-up, and symptoms that should prompt return to the ED were each discussed less than 65% of the time. Only 16% of patients were asked whether they had questions, and there were no instances in which the provider confirmed patient understanding of the information. CONCLUSION: Academic EDs present unique challenges to effective communication. In our study, the physician-patient encounter was brief and lacking in important health information. Provision of patient-centered care in academic EDs will require more provider education and significant system support.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We characterize communication in an urban, academic medical center emergency department (ED) with regard to the timing and nature of the medical history survey and physical examination and discharge instructions. METHODS: Audiotaping and coding of 93 ED encounters (62 medical history surveys and physical examinations, 31 discharges) with a convenience sample of 24 emergency medicine residents, 8 nurses, and 93 nonemergency adult patients. RESULTS:Patients were 68% women and 84% black, with a mean age of 45 years. Emergency medicine providers were 70% men and 80% white. Of 62 medical history surveys and physical examinations, time spent on the introduction and medical history survey and physical examination averaged 7 minutes 31 seconds (range 1 to 20 minutes). Emergency medicine residents introduced themselves in only two thirds of encounters, rarely (8%) indicating their training status. Despite physician tendency (63%) to start with an open-ended question, only 20% of patients completed their presenting complaint without interruption. Average time to interruption (usually a closed question) was 12 seconds. Discharge instructions averaged 76 seconds (range 7 to 202 seconds). Information on diagnosis, expected course of illness, self-care, use of medications, time-specified follow-up, and symptoms that should prompt return to the ED were each discussed less than 65% of the time. Only 16% of patients were asked whether they had questions, and there were no instances in which the provider confirmed patient understanding of the information. CONCLUSION: Academic EDs present unique challenges to effective communication. In our study, the physician-patient encounter was brief and lacking in important health information. Provision of patient-centered care in academic EDs will require more provider education and significant system support.
Authors: Christopher T Richards; Michael A Gisondi; Chih-Hung Chang; D Mark Courtney; Kirsten G Engel; Linda Emanuel; Tammie Quest Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2011-05-06 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Danielle M McCarthy; Katherine R Waite; Laura M Curtis; Kirsten G Engel; David W Baker; Michael S Wolf Journal: Med Care Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Vineet M Arora; Caitlin Schaninger; Michael D'Arcy; Julie K Johnson; Holly J Humphrey; James N Woodruff; David O Meltzer Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2009-12
Authors: Katie L Lappé; Sonja E Raaum; Claire E Ciarkowski; Santosh P Reddy; Stacy A Johnson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-03-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Colleen K Gutman; Eileen J Klein; Kristin Follmer; Julie C Brown; Beth E Ebel; K Casey Lion Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2020-08-09
Authors: Ivy Benjenk; Eva H DuGoff; Gwen C Jacobsohn; Nia Cayenne; Courtney M C Jones; Thomas V Caprio; Jeremy T Cushman; Rebecca K Green; Amy J H Kind; Michael Lohmeier; Ranran Mi; Manish N Shah Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2020-09-07 Impact factor: 3.451