Literature DB >> 15331894

Long-term outcomes in patients with prostate cancer managed with intermittent androgen suppression.

T M Lane1, W Ansell, D Farrugia, P Wilson, G Williams, F Chinegwundoh, T Philp, J Hines, R T D Oliver.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term outcomes of patients with prostate cancer managed with intermittent androgen suppression (IAS) following their enrollment in an open, non-randomised feasibility study initiated 10 years ago. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with prostate cancer who developed marked side effects following androgen deprivation were considered for entry into the study. All patients were required to have been managed with androgen deprivation for a minimum of 9 months and to have achieved PSA remissions to levels <4 ng/ml or falls to greater than 90% of pre-treatment levels. Patients remained off treatment until PSA values rose to >20 ng/ml or individuals became symptomatic--at which stage a 9-month cycle of androgen suppression was repeated. Such on-off cycling continued until hormone-resistant disease developed and patients proceeded (off trial) to second-line therapies.
RESULTS: 75 patients were recruited to the study following an initial referral with treatment-related side effects specifically associated with androgen deprivation. 86% of these remain alive at a median of 134 months (11 years) since initial histological diagnosis. Survival times and times to hormone resistance (from first cycle hormone deprivation) have also been calculated. Overall there is a median survival time of 95 months (8 years) from initial (first-cycle) androgen deprivation in those presenting with localised or locally advanced disease and a median survival time of 87 months (7 years) for those presenting with metastatic disease. There exists a median of 83 months to hormone resistance in the localised and locally advanced group and a median of 50 months in those presenting with metastatic disease. We have calculated a 100% 5-year actuarial survival rate for those presenting with localised or locally advanced disease (from time of first cycle hormone ablation) and a 70% 5-year actuarial survival rate for those presenting with metastatic.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcome figures and actuarial survival rates presented here provide further support for a pulsed or intermittent approach to androgen ablation in patients with prostate cancer. In addition, they serve as valuable extended outcome data for patients managed in this way. Likewise, data presented here suggests that apparent survival advantages appear related, at least in part, to a delay in the onset of androgen resistance and that such a management approach is both safe and effective in those presenting with both metastatic disease as well as those with more localised pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15331894     DOI: 10.1159/000079690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  10 in total

Review 1.  The role of intermittent androgen deprivation therapy in the management of biochemically recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jasbir Jaswal; Juanita Crook
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  The effective management of biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  David G McLeod
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

3.  Intermittent versus continuous androgen suppression therapy: do we have consensus yet?

Authors:  N C Buchan; S L Goldenberg
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  Intermittent androgen suppression for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas C Buchan; S Larry Goldenberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  [Androgen deprivation for advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  A Heidenreich; D Pfister; C H Ohlmann; U H Engelmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Saudi Oncology Society clinical management guidelines for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ashraf J Abusamra; Shouki Bazarbashi; Yasser Bahader; Hussain Kushi; Danny Rabah; Dany Rabbah; Naser Al Bogami; Khalid Al Ghamdi; Abdullah Al Ghamdi; Khaled Balaraj; Raouf Seyam; Mohammed Al Otaibi; Eyad Al Saeed
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2011-03

7.  A randomized, phase II study of pazopanib in castrate-sensitive prostate cancer: a University of Chicago Phase II Consortium/Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium study.

Authors:  J E Ward; T Karrison; G Chatta; M Hussain; D Shevrin; R Z Szmulewitz; P H O'Donnell; W M Stadler; E M Posadas
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 5.554

8.  Saudi oncology society and Saudi urology association combined clinical management guidelines for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sultan Alkhateeb; Ashraf Abusamra; Danny Rabah; Mohammed Alotaibi; Rana Mahmood; Mubarak Almansour; Esam Murshid; Abdullah Alsharm; Ashwaq Alolayan; Imran Ahmad; Hussain Alkushi; Abdullah Alghamdi; Shouki Bazarbashi
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2014-10

Review 9.  Intermittent versus continuous androgen suppression for prostatic cancer.

Authors:  P D Conti; A N Atallah; H Arruda; B G O Soares; R P El Dib; T J Wilt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

Review 10.  Current opinion on the role of testosterone in the development of prostate cancer: a dynamic model.

Authors:  Xiaohui Xu; Xinguang Chen; Hui Hu; Amy B Dailey; Brandie D Taylor
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.