Literature DB >> 15331805

Work-life differences and outcomes for agency and consumer-directed home-care workers.

A E Benjamin1, Ruth E Matthias.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Research on home-care outcomes has highlighted the promise of consumer-directed models that rely on recipients rather than agencies to arrange and direct services. However, there has been little research on workers employed directly by recipients. This study examined differences in work-life and worker outcomes between workers in consumer-directed versus agency care as well as between family and nonfamily workers. DESIGN AND METHODS: A random sample of 618 workers in the In-Home Supportive Services program in California was selected and interviewed by telephone between September 1996 and March 1997. Interviews were conducted in English, Spanish, and three Asian languages, with a focus on worker stress and satisfaction.
RESULTS: Findings indicate a mixed portrait of worker experience and outcomes. Most model differences disappear when other variables are controlled, but some worker-stress differences persist between models and types of worker. IMPLICATIONS: On most dimensions of stress and satisfaction, consumer-directed workers report outcomes equal to or more positive than agency workers. Efforts to improve the work life of home-care workers should acknowledge the strengths of consumer-directed approaches and target all workers across models.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15331805     DOI: 10.1093/geront/44.4.479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontologist        ISSN: 0016-9013


  12 in total

1.  Job stress and job satisfaction: home care workers in a consumer-directed model of care.

Authors:  Linda Delp; Steven P Wallace; Jeanne Geiger-Brown; Carles Muntaner
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Walking the Line: Navigating Market and Gift Economies of Care in a Consumer-Directed Home-Based Care Program for Older Adults.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Torres; Kathryn G Kietzman; Steven P Wallace
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  How caregivers and workers fared in Cash and Counseling.

Authors:  Leslie Foster; Stacy B Dale; Randall Brown
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Medically complex home care and caregiver strain.

Authors:  Sara M Moorman; Cameron Macdonald
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2012-05-04

5.  Symptom Assessment Solutions for In-Home Supportive Services and Diverse Older Adults: A Roadmap for Change.

Authors:  Donna H Odierna; Mary T Katen; Mariko A Feuz; Ryan D McMahan; Christine S Ritchie; Shireen McSpadden; Mark Burns; Aiesha M Volow; Rebecca L Sudore
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Home care aides' voices from the field: job experiences of personal support specialists.

Authors:  Alison Ashley; Sandra S Butler; Nancy Fishwick
Journal:  Home Healthc Nurse       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

7.  The Cost of Caring: Economic Vulnerability, Serious Emotional Distress, and Poor Health Behaviors Among Paid and Unpaid Family and Friend Caregivers.

Authors:  Geoffrey J Hoffman; Steven P Wallace
Journal:  Res Aging       Date:  2017-12-04

8.  Supporting In-Home Caregivers in Symptom Assessment of Frail Older Adults with Serious Illness: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sarah Nouri; Christine Ritchie; Pei Chen; Aiesha Volow; Brookelle Li; Ismael Tellez; Rebecca L Sudore
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 2.947

9.  A portrait of older californians with disabilities who rely on public services to remain independent.

Authors:  Kathryn G Kietzman; Steven P Wallace; Eva M Durazo; Jacqueline M Torres; Anne Soon Choi; A E Benjamin; Carolyn Mendez-Luck
Journal:  Home Health Care Serv Q       Date:  2012

10.  Protecting home health care workers: a challenge to pandemic influenza preparedness planning.

Authors:  Sherry Baron; Kathleen McPhaul; Sally Phillips; Robyn Gershon; Jane Lipscomb
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.