Literature DB >> 15331652

Stereoscopic processing of absolute and relative disparity in human visual cortex.

Peter Neri1, Holly Bridge, David J Heeger.   

Abstract

Stereoscopic vision relies mainly on relative depth differences between objects rather than on their absolute distance in depth from where the eyes fixate. However, relative disparities are computed from absolute disparities, and it is not known where these two stages are represented in the human brain. Using functional MRI (fMRI), we assessed absolute and relative disparity selectivity with stereoscopic stimuli consisting of pairs of transparent planes in depth in which the absolute and relative disparity signals could be independently manipulated (at a local spatial scale). In experiment 1, relative disparity was kept constant, while absolute disparity was varied in one-half the blocks of trials ("mixed" blocks) and kept constant in the remaining one-half ("same" blocks), alternating between blocks. Because neuronal responses undergo adaptation and reduce their firing rate following repeated presentation of an effective stimulus, the fMRI signal reflecting activity of units selective for absolute disparity is expected to be smaller during "same" blocks as compared with "mixed" ones. Experiment 2 similarly manipulated relative disparity rather than absolute disparity. The results from both experiments were consistent with adaptation with differential effects across visual areas such that 1) dorsal areas (V3A, MT+/V5, V7) showed more adaptation to absolute than to relative disparity; 2) ventral areas (hV4, V8/V4alpha) showed an equal adaptation to both; and 3) early visual areas (V1, V2, V3) showed a small effect in both experiments. These results indicate that processing in dorsal areas may rely mostly on information about absolute disparities, while ventral areas split neural resources between the two types of stereoscopic information so as to maintain an important representation of relative disparity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15331652     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01042.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  70 in total

Review 1.  Neural computations underlying depth perception.

Authors:  Akiyuki Anzai; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Bridging the gap: global disparity processing in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Suzanne P McKee; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neural modulation by binocular disparity greatest in human dorsal visual stream.

Authors:  Loredana Minini; Andrew J Parker; Holly Bridge
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Orientation-selective adaptation to first- and second-order patterns in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Jonas Larsson; Michael S Landy; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Linking neural representation to function in stereoscopic depth perception: roles of the middle temporal area in coarse versus fine disparity discrimination.

Authors:  Takanori Uka; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Coding of stereoscopic depth information in visual areas V3 and V3A.

Authors:  Akiyuki Anzai; Syed A Chowdhury; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Motion aftereffects specific to surface depth order: beyond binocular disparity.

Authors:  Wonyeong Sohn; Adriane E Seiffert
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Brain areas selective for both observed and executed movements.

Authors:  Ilan Dinstein; Uri Hasson; Nava Rubin; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Adaptive estimation of three-dimensional structure in the human brain.

Authors:  Tim J Preston; Zoe Kourtzi; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Time course of the effect of the Muller-Lyer illusion on saccades and perceptual judgments.

Authors:  Anouk J de Brouwer; Eli Brenner; W Pieter Medendorp; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.