Literature DB >> 15331622

Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on bimanual movements.

Jen-Tse Chen1, Yung-Yang Lin, Din-E Shan, Zin-An Wu, Mark Hallett, Kwong-Kum Liao.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex can interrupt voluntary contralateral rhythmic limb movements. Using the method of "resetting index" (RI), our study investigated the TMS effect on different types of bimanual movements. Six normal subjects participated. For unimanual movement, each subject tapped either the right or left index finger at a comfortable rate. For bimanual movement, index fingers of both hands tapped in the same (in-phase) direction or in the opposite (antiphase) direction. TMS was applied to each hemisphere separately at various intensities from 0.5 to 1.5 times motor threshold (MT). TMS interruption of rhythm was quantified by RI. For the unimanual movements, TMS disrupted both contralateral and ipsilateral rhythmic hand movements, although the effect was much less in the ipsilateral hand. For the bimanual in-phase task, TMS could simultaneously reset the rhythmic movements of both hands, but the effect on the contralateral hand was less and the effect on the ipsilateral hand was more compared with the unimanual tasks. Similar effects were seen from right and left hemisphere stimulation. TMS had little effect on the bimanual antiphase task. The equal effect of right and left hemisphere stimulation indicates that neither motor cortex is dominant for simple bimanual in-phase movement. The smaller influence of contralateral stimulation and the greater effect of ipsilateral stimulation during bimanual in-phase movement compared with unimanual movement suggest hemispheric coupling. The antiphase movements were resistant to TMS disruption, and this suggests that control of rhythm differs in the 2 tasks. TMS produced a transient asynchrony of movements on the 2 sides, indicating that both motor cortices might be downstream of the clocking command or that the clocking is a consequence of the 2 hemispheres communicating equally with each other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15331622     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01063.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  10 in total

1.  Functional connectivity patterns during motor behaviour: the impact of past on present activity.

Authors:  Deborah J Serrien
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Cortical areas functionally linked with the cerebellar second homunculus during out-of-phase bimanual movements.

Authors:  Christophe Habas; Emmanuel Alain Cabanis
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Neural correlates of tactile perception during pre-, peri-, and post-movement.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle; Tobias Heed; Charles Spence; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Neural motor control differs between bimanual common-goal vs. bimanual dual-goal tasks.

Authors:  Wan-Wen Liao; Jill Whitall; Joseph E Barton; Sandy McCombe Waller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Neural correlates of bimanual anti-phase and in-phase movements in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Liang Wang; Mark Hallett; Kuncheng Li; Piu Chan
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Deficits in Coordinative Bimanual Timing Precision in Children With Specific Language Impairment.

Authors:  Janet Vuolo; Lisa Goffman; Howard N Zelaznik
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Corticospinal Modulations during Bimanual Movement with Different Relative Phases.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Nomura; Yasutomo Jono; Keisuke Tani; Yuta Chujo; Koichi Hiraoka
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The Difference of Neural Networks between Bimanual Antiphase and In-Phase Upper Limb Movements: A Preliminary Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Qiang Lin; Hai Li; Yu-Rong Mao; Wai-Leung Lo; Jiang-Li Zhao; Ling Chen; Yan Leng; Dong-Feng Huang; Le Li
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.342

9.  The correlations between kinematic profiles and cerebral hemodynamics suggest changes of motor coordination in single and bilateral finger movement.

Authors:  Guangquan Zhou; Yuzhao Chen; Xiaohan Wang; Hao Wei; Qinghua Huang; Le Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.473

10.  M1-P15 as a cortical marker for transcallosal inhibition: A preregistered TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Agnese Zazio; Guido Barchiesi; Clarissa Ferrari; Eleonora Marcantoni; Marta Bortoletto
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.473

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.