Literature DB >> 15330826

Botulinum neurotoxin type A in the preventive treatment of refractory headache: a review of 100 consecutive cases.

Stewart J Tepper1, Marcelo E Bigal, Fred D Sheftell, Alan M Rapoport.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To review the efficacy of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) in the preventive treatment of refractory headache.
BACKGROUND: Even after receiving expert care, some patients with refractory headache continue to have high disability and persistent headaches.
METHODS: Clinical records and headache calendars of 100 patients fulfilling the following inclusion criteria were reviewed: (1) age from 18 to 65 years; (2) primary headache with previous failure of at least four preventive treatments; and (3) have received BoNT-A and have been followed for at least 6 months after the BoNT-A injections. BoNT-A (100 units) was diluted in 4-cc normal saline. The muscles injected included some or all of the following: frontalis, temporalis, corrugator, procerus, occipitalis, semispinalis, splenius capitis, trapezius, cervical paraspinalis, and sternocleidomastoid. Migraine-related disability was assessed using the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant reduction of the frequency of headache days 1 month after BoNT-A was administered (14.2 vs 28.2 days at the baseline, P <.001), which was maintained through the 3 months of study; similarly, a significant reduction in the headache index (22.3 vs 40.3, P <.001) and number of severe days with headache per month (2.6 vs 7.4, P <.001) were found at 1 month and maintained through the 3 months of study. MIDAS scores were reduced from 34.5 at baseline to 15.9 at 3 months (P <.001). A similar pattern was found in those overusing versus nonoverusing acute medication, though the response was more dramatic in the nonoverusing subgroup.
CONCLUSION: BoNT-A may play a role in the preventive treatment of refractory headache. A significant number of patients showed decrease in clinically important measurements of their headaches as well as reduced headache-related disability with this treatment. Prospective, controlled studies must be considered for severely disabled, refractory patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15330826     DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2004.04147.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Headache        ISSN: 0017-8748            Impact factor:   5.887


  7 in total

Review 1.  Prophylactic migraine therapy: emerging treatment options.

Authors:  Marcelo E Bigal; Abouch V Krymchantowski; Alan M Rapoport
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2004-06

2.  Local therapies in migraine.

Authors:  Marco Aguggia
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 3.  Treating headaches with botulinum toxin.

Authors:  Marco Aguggia
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 4.  Botulinum toxin type a for chronic migraine.

Authors:  Avi Ashkenazi
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  Migraine prophylaxis with botulinum toxin A is associated with perception of headache.

Authors:  Rami Burstein; David Dodick; Stephen Silberstein
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 3.033

6.  Exploding vs. imploding headache in migraine prophylaxis with Botulinum Toxin A.

Authors:  Moshe Jakubowski; Peter J McAllister; Zahid H Bajwa; Thomas N Ward; Patty Smith; Rami Burstein
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 7.  Pharmacoprophylaxis of tension-type headache.

Authors:  Marc E Lenaerts
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2005-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.