Literature DB >> 15330120

Size dependent sexual selection in Drosophila ananassae.

Seema Sisodia1, Bashisth N Singh.   

Abstract

Mate choice based on body size is widespread and can have numerous consequences. We present data, which show the effect of male and female body size on sexual selection in Drosophila ananassae. The relationships between wing size, locomotor activity, mating latency, courtship pattern, fertility and mating success were studied. Mating latency was negatively correlated with wing length and with locomotor activity, while wing length and locomotor activity was positively correlated in males as well as in females. In female- and male-choice, we found that mate choice influenced size-assortative mating by: (1) large and small males preferring to mate with large females, (2) large males successfully competing for large females, leaving small males to mate with small females. Males increased their reproductive success by mating with large and more fecund females. In addition, in pairs of long/short winged flies, long winged flies courted and mated more successfully than short winged flies and they also have longer duration of copulation and more progeny than short winged flies. We found sterile mating in pairs of small winged males and females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15330120     DOI: 10.1023/b:gene.0000040390.90003.7f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  8 in total

1.  Quantitative trait loci affecting phenotypic plasticity and the allometric relationship of ovariole number and thorax length in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alan O Bergland; Anne Genissel; Sergey V Nuzhdin; Marc Tatar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Benefits of size dimorphism and copulatory silk wrapping in the sexually cannibalistic nursery web spider, Pisaurina mira.

Authors:  Alissa G Anderson; Eileen A Hebets
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Meta-analysis reveals that animal sexual signalling behaviour is honest and resource based.

Authors:  Liam R Dougherty
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Choosing between good and better: optimal oviposition drives host plant selection when parents and offspring agree on best resources.

Authors:  Martín Videla; Graciela R Valladares; Adriana Salvo
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Gender based disruptive selection maintains body size polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jaya Handa; K T Chandrashekara; Khushboo Kashyap; Geetanjali Sageena; Mallikarjun N Shakarad
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 6.  Status of research on Drosophila ananassae at global level.

Authors:  B N Singh; J P Yadav
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 7.  The better, the choosier: A meta-analysis on interindividual variation of male mate choice.

Authors:  Pietro Pollo; Shinichi Nakagawa; Michael M Kasumovic
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 11.274

8.  The effects of a bacterial challenge on reproductive success of fruit flies evolved under low or high sexual selection.

Authors:  Magdalena Nystrand; Elizabeth J Cassidy; Damian K Dowling
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.