Literature DB >> 15329920

Quality of life and survival prediction in terminal cancer patients: a multicenter study.

Antonio Vigano1, Nora Donaldson, Irene J Higginson, Eduardo Bruera, Salaheddin Mahmud, Maria Suarez-Almazor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measurements from patients and staff can be combined with medical data to predict survival in patients with terminal cancer.
METHODS: The correlations between survival and potential health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) prognostic variables were explored in 2 independent cohorts of patients with terminal cancer (248 patients in Cohort 1 and 756 patients in Cohort 2) after adjusting for clinical and demographics variables using Cox regression models.
RESULTS: At the onset of the terminal phase (Cohort 1), the hazards of dying increased by 28% in the presence of dyspnea and by 68% in the presence of nausea/emesis; however, the most important predictors of worse survival were the presence of liver metastases (hazard ratio [HR], 2.5; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.8-3.8), lung tumor (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.7-3.4), and tumor burden (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-2.7). In contrast, for patients who were seen in later stages of their terminal disease (Cohort 2), dyspnea (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9) and the coexistence of weakness with a diagnosis of digestive tumors (HR, 5.2; 95% CI, 1.2-21.8), breast tumors (HR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.6-6.2), and genitourinary tumors (HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.6-7.8) were more predictive of survival than the type of tumor primary. Emotional functioning along with anxiety, spiritual distress, and lack of insight were not associated consistently with survival in both cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: Health care professionals should focus on physical HRQoL indicators, such as nausea and emesis, dyspnea, and weakness, to gather prognostic clues in patients with terminal cancer. These symptoms may reflect consequences of cancer cachexia and the progress of patients toward this terminal syndrome. Psychosocial distress did not appear to be associated consistently with survival; however, future studies should clarify further the prognostic significance of "positive attitudes", such as hope and optimism, in patients with advanced cancer. Copyright 2004 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15329920     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  43 in total

1.  Development of a prognostic model for six-month mortality in older adults with declining health.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Minjung Lee; Bryce B Reeve; Angela B Mariotto; Zhuoqiao Wang; Ron D Hays; K Robin Yabroff; Marie Topor; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 2.  Muscle atrophy in aging and chronic diseases: is it sarcopenia or cachexia?

Authors:  Maurizio Muscaritoli; Simone Lucia; Alessio Molfino; Tommy Cederholm; Filippo Rossi Fanelli
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Validation of the Cochin Risk Index Score (CRIS) for life expectancy prediction in terminally ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Durand; Olivier Mir; Romain Coriat; Anatole Cessot; Sylvain Pourchet; François Goldwasser
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Prediction and prognostic factors of post-recurrence survival in recurred patients with early-stage NSCLC who underwent complete resection.

Authors:  Pil Jo Choi; Sang Seok Jeong; Sung Sil Yoon
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Health-related quality of life among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients with end-stage disease.

Authors:  Niilo Färkkilä; Saku Torvinen; Risto P Roine; Harri Sintonen; Juha Hänninen; Kimmo Taari; Tiina Saarto
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Educational Attainment and Quality of Life among Older Adults before a Lung Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Rebecca M Schwartz; Kristin G Bevilacqua; Naomi Alpert; Bian Liu; Kavita V Dharmarajan; Katherine A Ornstein; Emanuela Taioli
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  Development and validation of a prognostic scale for hospitalized patients with terminally ill cancer in China.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Qingsong Xi; Shu Xia; Xushi Wang; Yong Liu; Chao Huang; Wei Zheng; Shiying Yu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  A longitudinal study of the role of patient-reported outcomes on survival prediction of palliative cancer inpatients in Taiwan.

Authors:  Jing-An Chang; Chia-Chin Lin
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL quality of life score as a prognostic indicator of survival in patients with far advanced cancer.

Authors:  Yong Joo Lee; Sang-Yeon Suh; Youn Seon Choi; Jae Yong Shim; Ah-Ram Seo; Sung-Eun Choi; Hong-Yup Ahn; Eunji Yim
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Construction of a new, objective prognostic score for terminally ill cancer patients: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Sang-Yeon Suh; Youn Seon Choi; Jae Yong Shim; Young Sung Kim; Chang Hwan Yeom; Daeyoung Kim; Shin Ae Park; Sooa Kim; Ji Yeon Seo; Su Hyun Kim; Daegyeun Kim; Sung-Eun Choi; Hong-Yup Ahn
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.