Literature DB >> 15329390

Input-driven components of spike-frequency adaptation can be unmasked in vivo.

Tim Gollisch1, Andreas V M Herz.   

Abstract

Spike-frequency adaptation affects the response characteristics of many sensory neurons, and different biophysical processes contribute to this phenomenon. Many cellular mechanisms underlying adaptation are triggered by the spike output of the neuron in a feedback manner (e.g., specific potassium currents that are primarily activated by the spiking activity). In contrast, other components of adaptation may be caused by, in a feedforward way, the sensory or synaptic input, which the neuron receives. Examples include viscoelasticity of mechanoreceptors, transducer adaptation in hair cells, and short-term synaptic depression. For a functional characterization of spike-frequency adaptation, it is essential to understand the dependence of adaptation on the input and output of the neuron. Here, we demonstrate how an input-driven component of adaptation can be uncovered in vivo from recordings of spike trains in an insect auditory receptor neuron, even if the total adaptation is dominated by output-driven components. Our method is based on the identification of different inputs that yield the same output and sudden switches between these inputs. In particular, we determined for different sound frequencies those intensities that are required to yield a predefined steady-state firing rate of the neuron. We then found that switching between these sound frequencies causes transient deviations of the firing rate. These firing-rate deflections are evidence of input-driven adaptation and can be used to quantify how this adaptation component affects the neural activity. Based on previous knowledge of the processes in auditory transduction, we conclude that for the investigated auditory receptor neurons, this adaptation phenomenon is of mechanical origin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15329390      PMCID: PMC6729645          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0398-04.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  20 in total

1.  Is the rapid adaptation paradigm too rapid? Implications for face and object processing.

Authors:  Dan Nemrodov; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Neural adaptation facilitates oscillatory responses to static inputs in a recurrent network of ON and OFF cells.

Authors:  Jeremie Lefebvre; Andre Longtin; Victor G LeBlanc
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Response recovery in the locust auditory pathway.

Authors:  Sarah Wirtssohn; Bernhard Ronacher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Retinal adaptation to object motion.

Authors:  Bence P Olveczky; Stephen A Baccus; Markus Meister
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Influence of sound pressure level on the processing of amplitude modulations by auditory neurons of the locust.

Authors:  Gerroth Weschke; Bernhard Ronacher
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  GABAergic signaling increases through the postnatal development to provide the potent inhibitory capability for the maturing demands of the prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Jihong Cui; Fang Wang; Ke Wang; Hui Xiang
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 5.046

7.  Dynamic dendritic compartmentalization underlies stimulus-specific adaptation in an insect neuron.

Authors:  Janez Prešern; Jeffrey D Triblehorn; Johannes Schul
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Computational themes of peripheral processing in the auditory pathway of insects.

Authors:  K Jannis Hildebrandt; Jan Benda; R Matthias Hennig
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Temporal processing properties of auditory DUM neurons in a bush-cricket.

Authors:  Andreas Stumpner; Paule Chloé Lefebvre; Marvin Seifert; Tim Daniel Ostrowski
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Characterizing the dynamic frequency structure of fast oscillations in the rodent hippocampus.

Authors:  David P Nguyen; Fabian Kloosterman; Riccardo Barbieri; Emery N Brown; Matthew A Wilson
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.