Literature DB >> 15329294

Brief cognitive assessment in schizophrenia: normative data for the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status.

Christopher M Wilk1, James M Gold, Kathy Humber, Faith Dickerson, Wayne S Fenton, Robert W Buchanan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) is a brief, standardized cognitive screening instrument that assesses several domains of interest and offers an efficient approach to screening for cognitive impairment in schizophrenia (SC). Prior studies have established the clinical validity and test-retest reliability of the RBANS in SC. AIMS: The purpose of the current study was to guide clinical interpretation by providing normative data for the use of the RBANS as a measure of cognitive impairment in SC. We also sought to evaluate the role of demographic factors and to present percentile data accordingly.
METHODS: 575 patients (391 male, 184 female) meeting the diagnostic criteria for SC or schizoaffective disorder were recruited from 4 inpatient (n=117) and 6 outpatient (n=458) sites in 2 different mental health treatment systems. All participants were administered the RBANS according to standardized instructions and a subgroup of 242 patients were also administered the Wide Range Achievement Test (3rd Edition) (WRAT-3) Reading subtest.
RESULTS: RBANS Total Scale score for patients with SC was approximately 2 standard deviations below the normal mean, was approximately 1 standard deviation below WRAT-3 Reading scores, and expected patterns of impairment were observed: measures of language and visuospatial ability were preserved relative to those of memory and attention. Aside from weak associations with Language (0.139) and Attention (0.112), age was not significantly associated with RBANS Index scores (which are age adjusted in healthy controls). Education was significantly associated with all RBANS scores and one-way ANOVA indicates that those with more than high school education scored consistently higher than the other two groups (less than and equal to a complete high school education). Normative tables with age and education based percentiles are presented.
CONCLUSIONS: The RBANS is an efficient screening tool for assessing cognitive impairment in patients with SC thereby making it a useful instrument for clinical and research applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15329294     DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2003.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  39 in total

1.  Is cognitive impairment in schizophrenia ready for diagnostic prime time?

Authors:  James M Gold
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  RBANS Validity Indices: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Robert D Shura; Timothy W Brearly; Jared A Rowland; Sarah L Martindale; Holly M Miskey; Kevin Duff
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Developing visually based, low-literacy health education tools for African Americans with psychotic disorders and their families.

Authors:  Beth Broussard; Jeremy B Radkins; Michael T Compton
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2014-03-16

Review 4.  The effects of aging on insight into illness in schizophrenia: a review.

Authors:  Philip Gerretsen; Eric Plitman; Tarek K Rajji; Ariel Graff-Guerrero
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.485

5.  Predictors of neuropsychological effort test performance in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Lindsay F Morra; James M Gold; Sara K Sullivan; Gregory P Strauss
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  The Impact of Childhood Adversity on Cognitive Development in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ruth Wells; Isabella Jacomb; Vaidy Swaminathan; Suresh Sundram; Danielle Weinberg; Jason Bruggemann; Vanessa Cropley; Rhoshel K Lenroot; Avril M Pereira; Andrew Zalesky; Chad Bousman; Christos Pantelis; Cynthia Shannon Weickert; Thomas W Weickert
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Ethics in Psychiatric Research: A Review of 25 Years of NIH-funded Empirical Research Projects.

Authors:  James Dubois; Holly Bante; Whitney B Hadley
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2011-12-06

8.  Should cognitive impairment be included in the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia?

Authors:  Richard S E Keefe
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 9.  Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia and affective psychoses: implications for DSM-V criteria and beyond.

Authors:  Emre Bora; Murat Yücel; Christos Pantelis
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 10.  Cognitive remediation in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Alice Medalia; Jimmy Choi
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 7.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.