Literature DB >> 15329034

High-dose chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Diana E Lake1, Clifford A Hudis.   

Abstract

High-dose chemotherapy is based on the scientific hypothesis that escalating the dose of drug will overcome drug resistance and improve outcome. Autologous bone marrow transplantation and, more recently, peripheral stem cell transplantation used as a means to restore marrow, made this a viable treatment for patients with selected tumours such as haematological malignancies. The role in breast cancer is less certain. Given the known as well as the potential toxicities, the objective of high-dose chemotherapy should be cure as opposed to palliation. However, the natural history of breast cancer can be protracted, with relapses occurring 15-20 years after treatment or within months of curative surgery. In breast cancer there is a positive correlation between recurrence-free and long-term survival. Therefore, the recurrence-free survival can be considered a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials. In patients with metastatic disease where cure is rare, at best, duration of a disease-free state may be a surrogate for overall benefit. Alternatively, time to progression may be another endpoint in the evaluation of treatment for metastatic disease. This is based on the assumption that quality of life is enhanced without progression of disease. Toxicity is the significant issue in the use of high-dose chemotherapy. The most common toxicity is myeloablation, potentially requiring prolonged hospitalisation. The only justification for these toxicities would be evidence of significant and meaningful benefit. A clinically relevant benefit with high-dose chemotherapy has not been seen in major randomised clinical trials of breast cancer in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting. In patients with advanced breast cancer, a small percentage may achieve long-term, disease-free survival, although there is no improvement in overall survival. Nonetheless, some investigators believe that high-dose chemotherapy holds promise, although currently this treatment is not recommended outside of a well designed prospective trial. These studies have provided useful information regarding cancer treatment. However, ongoing study of drug administration intervals, that is, dose-dense therapies, may lead to an approach that allows superior and less toxic treatment for breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15329034     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200464170-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  25 in total

1.  Insurance payments for bone marrow transplantation in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  D van Amerongen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Predicting the course of Gompertzian growth.

Authors:  L Norton; R Simon; H D Brereton; A E Bogden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  High-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  W P Peters; R D Dansey; J L Klein; R D Baynes
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2000

4.  High-dose versus standard chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: comparison of Cancer and Leukemia Group B trials with data from the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry.

Authors:  Donald A Berry; Gloria Broadwater; John P Klein; Karen Antman; Joseph Aisner; Jacob Bitran; Mary Costanza; Cesar O Freytes; Edward Stadtmauer; Robert Peter Gale; I Craig Henderson; Hillard M Lazarus; Philip L McCarthy; Larry Norton; Howard Parnes; Andrew Pecora; Michael C Perry; Philip Rowlings; Gary Spitzer; Mary M Horowitz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Tailored fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide compared with marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer: a randomised trial. Scandinavian Breast Group 9401 study.

Authors:  J Bergh; T Wiklund; B Erikstein; E Lidbrink; H Lindman; P Malmström; P Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; N O Bengtsson; G Söderlund; G Anker; E Wist; S Ottosson; E Salminen; P Ljungman; H Holte; J Nilsson; C Blomqvist; N Wilking
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-10-21       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Secondary myelodysplasia and acute leukemia in breast cancer patients after autologous bone marrow transplant.

Authors:  M J Laughlin; D S McGaughey; J R Crews; N J Chao; D Rizzieri; M Ross; J Gockerman; C Cirrincione; D Berry; L Mills; P Defusco; S LeGrand; W P Peters; J J Vredenburgh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Conventional-dose chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer. Philadelphia Bone Marrow Transplant Group.

Authors:  E A Stadtmauer; A O'Neill; L J Goldstein; P A Crilley; K F Mangan; J N Ingle; I Brodsky; S Martino; H M Lazarus; J K Erban; C Sickles; J H Glick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer: the results of 20 years of follow-up.

Authors:  G Bonadonna; P Valagussa; A Moliterni; M Zambetti; C Brambilla
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-04-06       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for high-risk breast cancer.

Authors:  Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Marijke Bontenbal; Louk V A M Beex; John Wagstaff; Dick J Richel; Marianne A Nooij; Emile E Voest; Pierre Hupperets; Harm van Tinteren; Hans L Peterse; Elisabeth M TenVergert; Elisabeth G E de Vries
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  erbB-2, p53, and efficacy of adjuvant therapy in lymph node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  A D Thor; D A Berry; D R Budman; H B Muss; T Kute; I C Henderson; M Barcos; C Cirrincione; S Edgerton; C Allred; L Norton; E T Liu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-09-16       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of acquired resistance to anti-cancer therapy.

Authors:  Jasmine Foo; Franziska Michor
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 2.  Improving Cancer Treatment via Mathematical Modeling: Surmounting the Challenges Is Worth the Effort.

Authors:  Franziska Michor; Kathryn Beal
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Cytotoxic and targeted therapy for hereditary cancers.

Authors:  Aglaya G Iyevleva; Evgeny N Imyanitov
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.857

4.  Evolution of resistance to targeted anti-cancer therapies during continuous and pulsed administration strategies.

Authors:  Jasmine Foo; Franziska Michor
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 4.475

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.