Dason E Evans1, Diana F Wood, C Michael Roberts. 1. Clinical, Communication and Learning Skills Unit, Bart's and the London, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies raise concerns over the preparedness of newly qualified doctors for the role of the pre-registration house officer (PRHO). This study aimed to assess self-perception of preparedness, objective assessment of core clinical skills and the effect of an extended clinical induction programme prior to commencing full duties. METHODS: A group of 26 newly qualified doctors from 1 district general hospital underwent an extended 5-day, ward-based induction programme. The participants completed questionnaires on their own perceptions of their preparedness for PRHO duties and underwent an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) of 4 core clinical skills prior to induction, on completion of induction and 1 month into working life. RESULTS: At the outset PRHOs had low perceptions of their own capabilities in all clinical scenarios and skills. Most perceptions improved after induction, although in 2 clinical areas they felt even less confident. One month into post there were significant improvements in all areas. Only 1 PRHO passed all 4 clinical skills assessments at the pre-induction assessment. Seven (26%) failed on 1 or more skills at the post-induction assessment. However, all participants were deemed competent in all skills at the 1-month assessment. CONCLUSION: Newly qualified doctors do not feel prepared for PRHO duties and objectively are not competent in basic clinical skills. An extended induction improves preparedness in some but not all clinical areas and improves performance of objectively assessed clinical skills.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies raise concerns over the preparedness of newly qualified doctors for the role of the pre-registration house officer (PRHO). This study aimed to assess self-perception of preparedness, objective assessment of core clinical skills and the effect of an extended clinical induction programme prior to commencing full duties. METHODS: A group of 26 newly qualified doctors from 1 district general hospital underwent an extended 5-day, ward-based induction programme. The participants completed questionnaires on their own perceptions of their preparedness for PRHO duties and underwent an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) of 4 core clinical skills prior to induction, on completion of induction and 1 month into working life. RESULTS: At the outset PRHOs had low perceptions of their own capabilities in all clinical scenarios and skills. Most perceptions improved after induction, although in 2 clinical areas they felt even less confident. One month into post there were significant improvements in all areas. Only 1 PRHO passed all 4 clinical skills assessments at the pre-induction assessment. Seven (26%) failed on 1 or more skills at the post-induction assessment. However, all participants were deemed competent in all skills at the 1-month assessment. CONCLUSION: Newly qualified doctors do not feel prepared for PRHO duties and objectively are not competent in basic clinical skills. An extended induction improves preparedness in some but not all clinical areas and improves performance of objectively assessed clinical skills.
Authors: Robert Daniel Kay; Aditya Manoharan; Saman Nematollahi; Joseph Nelson; Stephen Henry Cummings; William Joaquin Adamas Rappaport; Richard Amini Journal: J Orthop Date: 2016-09-15
Authors: Zachary M Bauman; John Loftus; Alex Hodson; Ashley Farrens; Valerie Shostrom; Jessica Summers; Paige E Phillips; Charity H Evans; Lisa L Schlitzkus Journal: World J Surg Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Helen A Scicluna; Michael C Grimm; Philip D Jones; Louis S Pilotto; H Patrick McNeil Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2014-02-03 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Jan C Illing; Gill M Morrow; Charlotte R Rothwell nee Kergon; Bryan C Burford; Beate K Baldauf; Carol L Davies; Ed B Peile; John A Spencer; Neil Johnson; Maggie Allen; Jill Morrison Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 2.463