Literature DB >> 15327498

Community-based assessment of adjuvant hormone therapy in women with breast cancer, 1991-1997.

Xianglin L Du1, Charles R Key, Cynthia Osborne.   

Abstract

This study used population-based tumor registry data to describe the patterns of adjuvant hormone therapy and to examine the correlates of hormone therapy for women with breast cancer. The study population included 5101 women (age 20 years) who were diagnosed with breast cancer in 1991 through 1997 in the entire state of New Mexico. Overall, 32% of women with stage I, II, or IIIA breast cancer received adjuvant hormone therapy. The likelihood of receiving adjuvant hormone therapy increased with tumor stage at diagnosis. Women less than 50 years of age were significantly less likely to receive adjuvant hormone therapy compared to those age 50 to 54 years, but there was no significant difference in the use of adjuvant hormone therapy for women age 55 years and older. The use of adjuvant hormone therapy was influenced by hormone receptor status and lymph node status. Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were also more likely to receive adjuvant hormone therapy than those who did not. The use of adjuvant hormone therapy alone was relatively stable over time and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy alone increased, but the receipt of chemotherapy combined with hormone therapy decreased from 1991 to 1997. There was no significant difference with age in the use of adjuvant hormone therapy among 55-year-old women compared to those age 50 to 54 years, whereas women less than 50 years of age were significantly less likely to receive this therapy. The use of adjuvant hormone therapy varied significantly by tumor stage, lymph node status, hormone receptor status, and the receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15327498      PMCID: PMC2566743          DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21357.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  29 in total

1.  Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality clinical practice guidelines: how quickly do guidelines become outdated?

Authors:  P G Shekelle; E Ortiz; S Rhodes; S C Morton; M P Eccles; J M Grimshaw; S H Woolf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, November 1-3, 2000.

Authors:  P Eifel; J A Axelson; J Costa; J Crowley; W J Curran; A Deshler; S Fulton; C B Hendricks; M Kemeny; A B Kornblith; T A Louis; M Markman; R Mayer; D Roter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-04       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Patterns of use of chemotherapy for breast cancer in older women: findings from Medicare claims data.

Authors:  X Du; J S Goodwin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Tumor characteristics and clinical outcome of elderly women with breast cancer.

Authors:  S G Diab; R M Elledge; G M Clark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-04-05       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Temporal and regional variation in the use of breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy for older women with early-stage breast cancer from 1983 to 1995.

Authors:  X Du; J L Freeman; D H Freeman; D A Syblik; J S Goodwin
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.053

6.  Increase of chemotherapy use in older women with breast carcinoma from 1991 to 1996.

Authors:  X Du; J S Goodwin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Effect of age and comorbidity in postmenopausal breast cancer patients aged 55 years and older.

Authors:  R Yancik; M N Wesley; L A Ries; R J Havlik; B K Edwards; J W Yates
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-02-21       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare-tumor registry database.

Authors:  A L Potosky; G F Riley; J D Lubitz; R M Mentnech; L G Kessler
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  1991 national survey of carcinoma of the breast by the Commission on Cancer.

Authors:  R T Osteen; B Cady; J S Chmiel; R E Clive; R L Doggett; M A Friedman; D H Hussey; W G Kraybill; M M Urist; D P Winchester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  The National Cancer Data Base report on breast cancer.

Authors:  R T Osteen; L H Karnell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  4 in total

1.  Information on chemotherapy and hormone therapy from tumor registry had moderate agreement with chart reviews.

Authors:  Xianglin L Du; Charles R Key; Lois Dickie; Ronald Darling; George L Delclos; Kim Waller; Dong Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ among patients cared for in large integrated health plans.

Authors:  Reina Haque; Ninah S Achacoso; Suzanne W Fletcher; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Laura C Collins; Stuart J Schnitt; Charles P Quesenberry; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Racial variation in adjuvant chemotherapy initiation among breast cancer patients receiving oncotype DX testing.

Authors:  Megan C Roberts; Morris Weinberger; Stacie B Dusetzina; Michaela A Dinan; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Melissa A Troester; Lisa A Carey; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Adjuvant hormonal therapy use among insured, low-income women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Gretchen Kimmick; Roger Anderson; Fabian Camacho; Monali Bhosle; Wenke Hwang; Rajesh Balkrishnan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 44.544

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.