Literature DB >> 15327494

The measurement of wound infection after breast surgery.

John C Hall1, Jane L Hall.   

Abstract

Infection in breast wounds often occurs in the form of cellulitis, but the conventional criteria for wound infection are the presence of either pus or a serous discharge containing pathogens. Wound scoring systems may offer a more quantitative and clinically relevant approach when evaluating the morbidity caused by infection in wounds. The aim of this study was to develop a wound scoring system for patients undergoing breast surgery. The components of previously described wound scoring systems were measured in 218 women undergoing nonreconstructive breast surgery. Using conventional criteria, the incidence of wound infection was 5.5% (12/218). However, 22% of the patients exhibited at least one sign of wound infection, and 11% of the patients received antibiotics for cellulitis without any other indication of a wound infection. The validity of the wound scoring system was supported by its strong content validity, the presence of construct validity as evidenced by concordance with the conventional criteria (p < 0.001), and criterion validity in the form of an association between the presence of a seroma and a positive wound score (p < 0.001). It was also noted that 27% of the patients with an appreciable wound score (more than 40 points) had cellulitis but did not satisfy the conventional criteria for a wound infection. In conclusion, it is advisable to use a wound scoring system that includes cellulitis when evaluating patients who have undergone breast surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15327494     DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21401.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  4 in total

1.  Incidence of Surgical Site Infection Following Mastectomy With and Without Immediate Reconstruction Using Private Insurer Claims Data.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Katelin B Nickel; Ida K Fox; Julie A Margenthaler; Kelly E Ball; Daniel Mines; Anna E Wallace; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  A Comparative Analysis of Surgical Wound Infection Methods: Predictive Values of the CDC, ASEPSIS, and Southampton Scoring Systems in Evaluating Breast Reconstruction Surgical Site Infections.

Authors:  Insiyah Campwala; Kayla Unsell; Subhas Gupta
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  Complete axillary dissection without drainage for the surgical treatment of breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ruffo Freitas-Junior; Luís Fernando Jubé Ribeiro; Marise Amaral Rebouças Moreira; Geraldo Silva Queiroz; Maurício Duarte Esperidião; Marco Aurélio Costa Silva; Rubens José Pereira; Rossana Araújo Catão Zampronha; Rosemar Macedo Sousa Rahal; Leonardo Ribeiro Soares; Danielle Laperche Dos Santos; Maria Virginia Thomazini; Cassiana Ferreira Silva de Faria; Régis Resende Paulinelli
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  Postoperative wound complications and systemic recurrence in breast cancer.

Authors:  B L Murthy; C S Thomson; D Dodwell; H Shenoy; J S Mikeljevic; D Forman; K Horgan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.