Literature DB >> 15327003

Selecting clinically relevant populations for reference intervals.

Robert F Ritchie1, Glenn Palomaki.   

Abstract

The selection of individuals to represent a group for any purpose can commit the effort to success or failure from the very outset. The description of this group must reflect what is, in reality, the purpose for which the group is being studied. Considering that reference intervals are designed to assist clinicians during diagnostic triage, criteria must reflect the nature of the subjects entering the system for care. The majority of people seeking care have non-life-threatening, yet troublesome complaints. In other words, persons who are in a reasonable state of health and who are not suffering from significant illness. Therefore the relevant cohort should fit this description, not individuals who lack any clinical or laboratory issues. Our focus is to employ reference intervals to exclude disease and not to define normality. Normality in the eyes of statisticians is quite different from the word as viewed by clinical staff, yet the term is used interchangeably without concern for its ultimate use. As a result medicine today stumbles over this issue at every turn. Scientists and artists do not speak the same language. Compounding this awkward situation has been the conviction that by increasing laboratory precision and accuracy, the utility of laboratory data, reference intervals in particular, will improve clinical understanding. This has, after many years, not proven to be the case. What has become very evident, however, is that unsustainably large sums of money are being devoted to improving laboratory performance. To what end, when we are unable to grasp the significance of what is available now including published reference intervals for common test values? A realistic perspective on the value of prevailing laboratory performance, as illustrated by reference intervals, must be adopted. The obligation of laboratories, its regulators and professional groups is to create a sustainable mechanism to provide clinically usable information, in a timely and affordable manner, to our population and to those legions of less fortunate humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15327003     DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2004.120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  11 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Cutoffs for Nutritional Biomarkers.

Authors:  Ramkripa Raghavan; Fayrouz Sakr Ashour; Regan Bailey
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Reference intervals for common laboratory tests in Melanesian children.

Authors:  Laurens Manning; Moses Laman; Mary Anne Townsend; Stephen P Chubb; Peter M Siba; Ivo Mueller; Timothy M E Davis
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Application of the stockholm hierarchy to defining the quality of reference intervals and clinical decision limits.

Authors:  Ken Sikaris
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2012-11

4.  Whether western normative laboratory values used for clinical diagnosis are applicable to Indian population? An overview on reference interval.

Authors:  T Malati
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2009-07-09

5.  Maternal serum proteome changes between the first and third trimester of pregnancy in rural southern Nepal.

Authors:  P F Scholl; R N Cole; I Ruczinski; M Gucek; R Diez; A Rennie; C Nathasingh; K Schulze; P Christian; J D Yager; J D Groopman; K P West
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Reference intervals for plasma free metanephrines with an age adjustment for normetanephrine for optimized laboratory testing of phaeochromocytoma.

Authors:  Graeme Eisenhofer; Peter Lattke; Maria Herberg; Gabriele Siegert; Nan Qin; Roland Därr; Jana Hoyer; Arno Villringer; Aleksander Prejbisz; Andrzej Januszewicz; Alan Remaley; Victoria Martucci; Karel Pacak; H Alec Ross; Fred C G J Sweep; Jacques W M Lenders
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.057

7.  Handgrip Strength: A Comparison of Values Obtained From the NHANES and NIH Toolbox Studies.

Authors:  Richard W Bohannon; Ying-Chih Wang; Sheng-Che Yen; Kimberly A Grogan
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr

8.  Gender differences in healthy ranges for serum alanine aminotransferase levels in adolescence.

Authors:  Hossein Poustchi; Jacob George; Saeed Esmaili; Farzaneh Esna-Ashari; Gelayol Ardalan; Sadaf Ghajarieh Sepanlou; Seyed Moayed Alavian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A prospective, cross-sectional study to establish age-specific reference intervals for neonates and children in the setting of clinical biochemistry, immunology and haematology: the HAPPI Kids study protocol.

Authors:  Monsurul Hoq; Vicky Karlaftis; Susan Mathews; Janet Burgess; Susan M Donath; John Carlin; Paul Monagle; Vera Ignjatovic
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Biopsychosocial Characteristics, Using a New Functional Measure of Balance, of an Elderly Population with CLBP.

Authors:  Ryan Hulla; Michael Moomey; Tyler Garner; Christopher Ray; Robert J Gatchel
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2016-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.