Literature DB >> 15326377

Stagnation and herd mentality in the biomedical sciences.

Jonathan R Brody1, Scott E Kern.   

Abstract

Academic biomedical science is like music, painting, or other fashionable arts and politics. Concepts that are perceived to be 'in' can become widely accepted and then stagnate, remaining unchallenged for many years, independent of their scientific validity. Fads in biomedical science have been observed to last for years or decades. The reasons for herd mentality and stagnation are manifold, but their recognition allows opportunities for constructive awareness and perhaps effective countermeasures.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15326377     DOI: 10.4161/cbt.3.9.1082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther        ISSN: 1538-4047            Impact factor:   4.742


  4 in total

Review 1.  Analytic model for academic research productivity having factors, interactions and implications.

Authors:  Scott Kern
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 2.  Evaluating the drug-target relationship between thymidylate synthase expression and tumor response to 5-fluorouracil. Is it time to move forward?

Authors:  Shayna L Showalter; Timothy N Showalter; Agnes Witkiewicz; Robert Havens; Eugene P Kennedy; Tomas Hucl; Scott E Kern; Charles J Yeo; Jonathan R Brody
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 3.  Why your new cancer biomarker may never work: recurrent patterns and remarkable diversity in biomarker failures.

Authors:  Scott E Kern
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Predicted patient demand for a new delivery system for glaucoma medicine.

Authors:  Semra Ozdemir; Tina T Wong; Robert Rand Allingham; Eric A Finkelstein
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.