Kazuki Ishibashi1, Jane Tian, James T Handa. 1. Michael Panitch Macular Degeneration Laboratory, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the expression profiles of morphologically normal human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells that originate from the macula and periphery. METHODS: Morphologically normal RPE cells from 15 human globes from donors aged 52 to 82 years old were laser capture microdissected. Total RNA from 5000 cells was SMART amplified, [33]P-labeled, and hybridized to a cDNA array containing 4325 known genes. Expression profiles were analyzed by hierarchical cluster analysis, Prediction Analysis of Microarrays (PAM), and Significance Analysis for Microarrays (SAM). Differentially expressed genes were evaluated further by real time RT-PCR. RESULTS: The overall expression profiles of RPE cells from the macula and periphery were similar. Unsupervised and supervised hierarchical cluster analysis showed that patient genotype was a stronger separating factor than topographical location. SAM analysis identified 11 genes that were underexpressed by macular RPE cells. The expression patterns of these 11 genes were confirmed by real time RT-PCR, with 5 genes reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas the overall expression profiles were similar between cells from the macula and periphery, subtle differential expression of five genes could contribute to RPE phenotypic differences based on topographic location. Copyright Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
PURPOSE: To determine the expression profiles of morphologically normal human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells that originate from the macula and periphery. METHODS: Morphologically normal RPE cells from 15 human globes from donors aged 52 to 82 years old were laser capture microdissected. Total RNA from 5000 cells was SMART amplified, [33]P-labeled, and hybridized to a cDNA array containing 4325 known genes. Expression profiles were analyzed by hierarchical cluster analysis, Prediction Analysis of Microarrays (PAM), and Significance Analysis for Microarrays (SAM). Differentially expressed genes were evaluated further by real time RT-PCR. RESULTS: The overall expression profiles of RPE cells from the macula and periphery were similar. Unsupervised and supervised hierarchical cluster analysis showed that patient genotype was a stronger separating factor than topographical location. SAM analysis identified 11 genes that were underexpressed by macular RPE cells. The expression patterns of these 11 genes were confirmed by real time RT-PCR, with 5 genes reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas the overall expression profiles were similar between cells from the macula and periphery, subtle differential expression of five genes could contribute to RPE phenotypic differences based on topographic location. Copyright Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
Authors: Yuko Yamada; Kazuko Ishibashi; Kazuki Ishibashi; Imran A Bhutto; Jane Tian; Gerard A Lutty; James T Handa Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2005-12-20 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: S Scott Whitmore; Alex H Wagner; Adam P DeLuca; Arlene V Drack; Edwin M Stone; Budd A Tucker; Shemin Zeng; Terry A Braun; Robert F Mullins; Todd E Scheetz Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Judith C Booij; Jacoline B ten Brink; Sigrid M A Swagemakers; Annemieke J M H Verkerk; Anke H W Essing; Peter J van der Spek; Arthur A B Bergen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marisol Cano; Rajesh Thimmalappula; Masashi Fujihara; Norihiro Nagai; Michael Sporn; Ai Ling Wang; Arthur H Neufeld; Shyam Biswal; James T Handa Journal: Vision Res Date: 2009-08-22 Impact factor: 1.886
Authors: Tinghuai Wu; Jane Tian; Roy G Cutler; Richard S Telljohann; David A Bernlohr; Mark P Mattson; James T Handa Journal: Lab Invest Date: 2009-05-11 Impact factor: 5.662