Literature DB >> 15325922

Impact of interventionalist volume, experience, and board certification on coronary angioplasty outcomes in the era of stenting.

Kishore J Harjai1, Aaron D Berman, Cindy L Grines, Joel Kahn, Dominic Marsalese, Rajendra H Mehta, Theodore Schreiber, Judith A Boura, William W O'Neill.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by high-volume operators may be associated with better outcomes. However, the relation between operator and outcome is confounded by hospital caseloads of PCI, with busier hospitals generally having better outcomes. We assessed the effect of operator characteristics (volume of PCI, years in practice, and board certification status) on contemporary outcomes of PCI in a busy center with high-volume operators. Between 1999 and 2001, 12,293 PCIs were performed at our center by 28 interventionalists. Patients' clinical risk was assessed with the previously validated Beaumont PCI Risk Score. Operators were classified as producing low, medium, or high volume (tertiles of annual PCI volume < or =92, 93 to 140, or >140, respectively), as less, medium, or great experience (tertiles of years in practice < or =8, 9 to 14, or >14 years, respectively), and board certified (68%) or not. In-hospital death rate and a composite end point (death, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, myocardial infarction, or stroke) occurred in 0.99% and 2.59% of patients, respectively. Operator volume, experience, and board certification showed no univariate or multivariate relation with the study end points. The Beaumont PCI Risk Score showed a strong independent relation with in-hospital death rate (adjusted odds ratio 1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 1.43, p <0.0001) and composite end point (odds ratio 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 1.22, p <0.0001). We conclude that, in contemporary PCI practice at a large center with high-volume operators, in-hospital outcomes are not affected by operator volume, experience, or board certification. Rather, patients' clinical risk score is the overriding determinant of clinical outcomes. Our findings emphasize the power of a well-organized high-volume system to minimize the impact of operator factors on outcomes of PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15325922     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.04.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  2 in total

1.  Relationship Between Operator Volume and Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Alexander C Fanaroff; Pearl Zakroysky; Daniel Wojdyla; Lisa A Kaltenbach; Matthew W Sherwood; Matthew T Roe; Tracy Y Wang; Eric D Peterson; Hitinder S Gurm; Mauricio G Cohen; John C Messenger; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Association Between 30-Day Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Education and Certification Variables for New York State Interventional Cardiologists.

Authors:  Sameed Ahmed M Khatana; Paul N Fiorilli; Ashwin S Nathan; Daniel M Kolansky; Nandita Mitra; Peter W Groeneveld; Jay Giri
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 6.546

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.