Literature DB >> 15325665

Intra-operative specimen analysis using faxitron microradiography for excision of mammographically suspicious, non-palpable breast lesions.

M Muttalib1, M Tisdall, R Scawn, S Shousha, R S Cummins, H D Sinnett.   

Abstract

Recent advances in digital imaging have made Faxitron microradiography an attractive alternative to intra-operative conventional specimen radiography (CSR) for the excision of wire-localized breast lesions. Faxitron specimen analysis time, usefulness of digital image manipulation and re-excision rates were evaluated in comparison to CSR in 299 consecutive wire-localized excisions for mammographically suspicious non-palpable breast lesions (172 procedures with Faxitron, 127 with CSR) in a non-randomized study. The corresponding mean operation times were 34.7 vs. 42.7 min and the respective re-excision rates were 19.8% vs. 31.5% (no significant difference on chi analysis P < 0.1). Faxitron digital image manipulation led to cavity biopsies in 50% (60/121) of the cancer excisions. In 19 of these (16%), histological excision margins were converted from incomplete to complete. The shorter Faxitron mean operating time enables an additional wire-localized operation per theatre list. Digital imaging guides the surgeon for additional cavity biopsies, resulting in re-excision rates as good as CSR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15325665     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2004.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  5 in total

1.  Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology versus Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Increases the Quality of Intraoperative Imaging?

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; G Dilbat; M Bani; P A Fasching; M P Lux; E Wenkel; S Schwab; C R Loehberg; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; M Uder; M Meier-Meitinger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Use of Tomosynthesis in Intraoperative Digital Specimen Radiography - Is a Reduction of Breast Re-excision Rates Possible?

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; G Dilbat; M R Bani; M P Lux; M Meier-Meitinger; E Wenkel; S Schwab; M W Beckmann; M Uder; B Adamietz
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology, Specimen Radiography System (SRS) and Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Can Optimise Surgical Therapy?

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; G Dilbat; M Bani; P A Fasching; K Heusinger; M P Lux; C R Loehberg; B Brehm; M Hammon; M Saake; P Dankerl; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; M Uder; M Meier-Meitinger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Intraoperative breast specimen assessment in breast conserving surgery: comparison between standard mammography imaging and a remote radiological system.

Authors:  Giovanna Mariscotti; Manuela Durando; Luca Jacopo Pavan; Alberto Tagliafico; Pier Paolo Campanino; Isabella Castellano; Riccardo Bussone; Ada Ala; Corrado De Sanctis; Laura Bergamasco; Paolo Fonio; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Evaluation of resection margins in breast conservation therapy: the pathology perspective-past, present, and future.

Authors:  Rajyasree Emmadi; Elizabeth L Wiley
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-11-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.