Literature DB >> 15325659

Prediction of breast cancer size by ultrasound, mammography and core biopsy.

M Golshan1, B B Fung, E Wiley, J Wolfman, A Rademaker, M Morrow.   

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and non-surgical tumor ablation rely upon imaging studies to determine tumor size. In this study the accuracy of ultrasound (US) mammography and core biopsy in determining tumor size was examined in 202 patients with Stages I and II breast cancer. The most accurate single modality for determining tumor size was mammography with a correlation coefficient of 0.66, followed by US (r = 0.48) and core biopsy (r = 0.28). Size measurements were less accurate in lobular than ductal cancers. The combination of the three modalities understaged 25% of the tumors > 1cm in size, and overstaged 10% of those < 1cm. The inability to accurately determine tumor size has important implications for the use of non-surgical ablation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15325659     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2004.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  12 in total

1.  Delays in primary surgical treatment are not associated with significant tumor size progression in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Jamie L Wagner; Carla L Warneke; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Isabelle Bedrosian; Gildy V Babiera; Henry M Kuerer; Kelly K Hunt; Wei Yang; Aysegul A Sahin; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Accuracy of physical examination, ultrasonography, and mammography in predicting residual pathologic tumor size in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Anees B Chagpar; Lavinia P Middleton; Aysegul A Sahin; Peter Dempsey; Aman U Buzdar; Attiqa N Mirza; Fredrick C Ames; Gildy V Babiera; Barry W Feig; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Merrick I Ross; S Eva Singletary
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Accuracy of ultrasonography and mammography in predicting pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Keune; Donna B Jeffe; Mario Schootman; Abigail Hoffman; William E Gillanders; Rebecca L Aft
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Prognostic imaging in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of locally-advanced breast cancer should be cost-effective.

Authors:  Marc Schegerin; Anna N A Tosteson; Peter A Kaufman; Keith D Paulsen; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Comparison of mammography and ultrasound in detecting residual disease following bioptic lumpectomy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Xiufeng Wu; Qingzhong Lin; Jianping Lu; Gang Chen; Y I Zeng; Yinglan Lin; Ying Chen; Yaoqin Wang; Jun Yan
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-14

6.  Accurate Estimation of Breast Tumor Size: A Comparison Between Ultrasonography, Mammography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Associated Contributing Factors.

Authors:  Shilan Azhdeh; Ahmad Kaviani; Nahid Sadighi; Maryam Rahmani
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2020-12-24

7.  Surgical outcome of patients with core-biopsy-proven nonpalpable breast carcinoma: a large cohort follow-up study.

Authors:  S van Esser; N H G M Peters; M A A J van den Bosch; W P Th M Mali; P H M Peeters; I H M Borel Rinkes; R van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Ultrasound-guided laser-induced thermal therapy for small palpable invasive breast carcinomas: a feasibility study.

Authors:  S van Esser; G Stapper; P J van Diest; M A A J van den Bosch; J H G M Klaessens; W P Th M Mali; I H M Borel Rinkes; R van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Accuracy of contrast-enhanced breast ultrasound for pre-operative tumor size assessment in patients diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  S van Esser; W B Veldhuis; R van Hillegersberg; P J van Diest; G Stapper; M ElOuamari; I H M Borel Rinkes; W P Th M Mali; M A A J van den Bosch
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Prediction of primary breast cancer size and T-stage using micro-computed tomography in lumpectomy specimens.

Authors:  Wafa M Sarraj; Rong Tang; Anas L Najjar; Molly Griffin; Anthony H Bui; Alan Zambeli-Ljepovic; Mike Senter-Zapata; Maya Lewin-Berlin; Leopoldo Fernandez; Juliette Buckley; Amy Ly; Elena Brachtel; Owen Aftreth; John Gilbertson; Yukako Yagi; Michele Gadd; Kevin S Hughes; Barbara L Smith; James S Michaelson
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2015-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.