Literature DB >> 15324976

Different formats for communicating surgical risks to patients and the effect on choice of treatment.

Danielle Timmermans1, Bert Molewijk, Anne Stiggelbout, Job Kievit.   

Abstract

Effective communication of treatment risks is important to enable patients to make informed decisions. This study aimed to determine the effects of different risk formats on participants' evaluation and interpretation of risk information and on their treatment choice. Participants (N = 44) were recruited among patients who had undergone surgery for an abdominal aneurysm and were asked to evaluate treatment risks (surgery or an observation policy) of two hypothetical cases presented in one of three risk formats (numbers, vertical bars or icons). Risk information presented in vertical bars was evaluated as the most difficult to comprehend, and the perceived threat of this information was evaluated as higher than that of the other risk formats. Risk information presented as icons was evaluated as more helpful for making a decision, but resulted in a lower percentage of participants choosing for surgery than when risks were presented in the other formats. In conclusion, this study showed that different risk formats have different effects on participants' evaluation of the information and on their choice. Doctors should therefore be careful in choosing the format in which they present treatment risks. Copyright 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15324976     DOI: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00238-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  21 in total

Review 1.  Empirical data and moral theory. A plea for integrated empirical ethics.

Authors:  Bert Molewijk; Anne M Stiggelbout; Wilma Otten; Heleen M Dupuis; Job Kievit
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2004

2.  Involving patients in cardiovascular risk management with nurse-led clinics: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marije S Koelewijn-van Loon; Trudy van der Weijden; Ben van Steenkiste; Gaby Ronda; Bjorn Winkens; Johan L Severens; Michel Wensing; Glyn Elwyn; Richard Grol
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The effect of format on parents' understanding of the risks and benefits of clinical research: a comparison between text, tables, and graphics.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2010-07

4.  Using animated computer-generated text and graphics to depict the risks and benefits of medical treatment.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Colleen Brennan-Martinez; Maureen McGonegal; Robert Levine
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Investigating the Heart Pump Implant Decision Process: Opportunities for Decision Support Tools to Help.

Authors:  Qian Yang; John Zimmerman; Aaron Steinfeld; Lisa Carey; James F Antaki
Journal:  ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.351

6.  Health literacy, numeracy, and interpretation of graphical breast cancer risk estimates.

Authors:  Sandra M Brown; Julie O Culver; Kathryn E Osann; Deborah J MacDonald; Sharon Sand; Andrea A Thornton; Marcia Grant; Deborah J Bowen; Kelly A Metcalfe; Harry B Burke; Mark E Robson; Susan Friedman; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-04

Review 7.  Accepting risk in clinical research: is the gene therapy field becoming too risk-averse?

Authors:  Claire T Deakin; Ian E Alexander; Ian Kerridge
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 11.454

8.  Using family history information to promote healthy lifestyles and prevent diseases; a discussion of the evidence.

Authors:  Liesbeth Claassen; Lidewij Henneman; A Cecile J W Janssens; Miranda Wijdenes-Pijl; Nadeem Qureshi; Fiona M Walter; Paula W Yoon; Danielle R M Timmermans
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Saudi young patient understanding of information about side effects: Verbal versus numerical expression.

Authors:  L Al Juffali; O Al Omran; S Al Aqeel
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Design and development of a decision aid to enhance shared decision making by patients with an asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Dirk T Ubbink; Anouk M Knops; Sjaak Molenaar; Astrid Goossens
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.