Literature DB >> 15324288

Grammatical tense deficits in children with SLI and nonspecific language impairment: relationships with nonverbal IQ over time.

Mabel L Rice1, J Bruce Tomblin, Lesa Hoffman, W Allen Richman, Janet Marquis.   

Abstract

The relationship between children's language acquisition and their nonverbal intelligence has a long tradition of scientific inquiry. Current attention focuses on the use of nonverbal IQ level as an exclusionary criterion in the definition of specific language impairment (SLI). Grammatical tense deficits are known as a clinical marker of SLI, but the relationship with nonverbal intelligence below the normal range has not previously been systematically studied. This study documents the levels of grammatical tense acquisition (for third-person singular -s, regular and irregular past tense morphology) in a large, epidemiologically ascertained sample of kindergarten children that comprises 4 groups: 130 children with SLI, 100 children with nonspecific language impairments (NLI), 73 children with low cognitive levels but language within normal limits (LC), and 117 unaffected control children. The study also documents the longitudinal course of acquisition for the SLI and NLI children between the ages of 6 and 10 years. The LC group did not differ from the unaffected controls at kindergarten, showing a dissociation of nonverbal intelligence and grammatical tense marking, so that low levels of nonverbal intelligence did not necessarily yield low levels of grammatical tense. The NLI group's level of performance was lower than that of the SLI group and showed a greater delay in resolution of the overgeneralization phase of irregular past tense mastery, indicating qualitative differences in growth. Implications for clinical groupings for research and clinical purposes are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15324288     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/061)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  46 in total

1.  Grammatical morphology in school-age children with and without language impairment: a discriminant function analysis.

Authors:  Maura Jones Moyle; Courtney Karasinski; Susan Ellis Weismer; Brenda K Gorman
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Expressive language profiles of verbally expressive adolescents and young adults with Down syndrome or fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Lizbeth H Finestack; Leonard Abbeduto
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Morphosyntax in Poor Comprehenders.

Authors:  Suzanne M Adlof; Hugh W Catts
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2015-04-01

4.  Examining Procedural Learning and Corticostriatal Pathways for Individual Differences in Language: Testing Endophenotypes of DRD2/ANKK1.

Authors:  Joanna C Lee; Kathryn L Mueller; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  Language learning of children with typical development using a deductive metalinguistic procedure.

Authors:  Lizbeth H Finestack
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The Role of Frequency in Learning Morphophonological Alternations: Implications for Children With Specific Language Impairment.

Authors:  Ekaterina Tomas; Katherine Demuth; Peter Petocz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Comparing Tense and Agreement Productivity in Boys With Fragile X Syndrome, Children With Developmental Language Disorder, and Children With Typical Development.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hilvert; Jill Hoover; Audra Sterling; Susen Schroeder
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Effects of Specific Language Impairment on a Contrastive Dialect Structure: The Case of Infinitival TO Across Various Nonmainstream Dialects of English.

Authors:  Andrew M Rivière; Janna B Oetting; Joseph Roy
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Judgments of omitted BE and DO in questions as extended finiteness clinical markers of specific language impairment (SLI) to 15 years: a study of growth and asymptote.

Authors:  Mabel L Rice; Lesa Hoffman; Ken Wexler
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 10.  Language growth and genetics of specific language impairment.

Authors:  Mabel L Rice
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.484

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.