Literature DB >> 15322695

[Ultrasonographic imaging of carotidynia: syndrome or entity?].

Ch Arning1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the past, carotidynia was regarded as a distinct syndrome of unilateral neck pain and tenderness of the carotid bifurcation without structural abnormality. At present, however, carotidynia is considered to be a misleading term for a nonvalidated entity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed ultrasonographic investigation in six consecutive cases that fulfilled clinical criteria of idiopathic carotidynia according to the former International Headache Society classification.
RESULTS: In all patients, poor echoic wall thickening of the carotid bulb was found exactly in the region of tenderness, leading to mild lumen narrowing and large outward extension of the vessel. In some cases, manifestation of the ultrasound findings could be seen in two different layers of the vessel wall. On follow-up evaluation within 3-5 weeks, the wall thickening was significantly smaller. In two patients having MRI of the carotid bifurcation, there was no evidence of intramural hematoma.
CONCLUSION: Our findings of similar ultrasonographic patterns in all patients suggest that carotidynia is a distinct entity possibly caused by inflammation. The findings correspond to recently published MRI and histological data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15322695     DOI: 10.1007/s00115-004-1754-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nervenarzt        ISSN: 0028-2804            Impact factor:   1.214


  10 in total

Review 1.  Spontaneous dissection of the carotid and vertebral arteries.

Authors:  W I Schievink
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-03-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.292

3.  Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.292

4.  Carotidynia.

Authors:  E Chiossone; M E Quiroga
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 1.469

Review 5.  The myth of carotidynia.

Authors:  V Biousse; M G Bousser
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  [Carotidynia].

Authors:  F Reimer
Journal:  Vasa       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.961

7.  Carotidynia. A distinct syndrome.

Authors:  D M Roseman
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1967-01

8.  MR imaging of patients with carotidynia.

Authors:  B S Burton; M J Syms; G W Petermann; L P Burgess
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Carotid vascular pain--a simple treatment.

Authors:  K K Nair
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Histologic confirmation of carotidynia.

Authors:  Peter D Upton; J G Walker Smith; David R Charnock
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.591

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Imaging by multiple modalities of patients with a carotidynia syndrome.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kosaka; Tadashi Sagoh; Hidemasa Uematsu; Hirohiko Kimura; Shiro Miyayama; Masato Noguchi; Harumi Itoh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  [Recurrence of carotodynia or TIPIC syndrome].

Authors:  J Schaumberg; P Michels; B Eckert; J Röther
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.214

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.