Literature DB >> 15322499

On the challenges of using evidence-based information: the role of clinical uncertainty.

Amit K Ghosh1.   

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine helps physicians appraise the latest and best evidence and incorporate patient's values in reaching a shared clinical decision. However, many decisions in medicine are made in the paucity of best evidence. Medical uncertainty remains inherent in clinical practice and contributes to significant variability in the way physicians and patients manage medical problems. Physicians and patients have varying degrees of tolerance for uncertainty. Intolerance to uncertainty among physicians results in increased test ordering tendencies, variability in medical treatment, failure to comply with evidence-based guidelines, and even guide career choices. Factors that result in the variability of physicians' interpretation of an effective treatment include: patient factors (prioritizing some factors over others), physician factors (lack of knowledge, lack of resources, medical uncertainty), and environmental factors (limitation of time and practice). Several approaches that have been found useful in implementing evidence in clinical practice include: sending reminders to prompt physicians to perform patient-related clinical activities, introducing computer information systems to support practice, and using interactive education interventions to teach newer skills and challenge negative attitudes. Passive educational approaches, like dissemination of guidelines and didactic lectures, are usually less useful in changing behavior. Among the techniques found to be useful for managing uncertainty are shared decision making, meticulous history taking, and physical examination, excluding worrisome differential diagnosis and establishing trust in patients. The role of future studies in assessing the outcome of multiple evidence-based strategies in situations of medical uncertainty remains to be explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15322499     DOI: 10.1016/j.lab.2004.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Lab Clin Med        ISSN: 0022-2143


  21 in total

1.  The debate over health care reform: Houston, we have a problem.

Authors:  Eric G Neilson
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  Uncertainty, responsibility, and the evolution of the physician/patient relationship.

Authors:  M S Henry
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Understanding behavioral intent to participate in shared decision-making in medically uncertain situations.

Authors:  Roxana M Maffei; K Dunn; J Zhang; C E Hsu; J H Holmes
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  Resilience among Employed Physicians and Mid-Level Practitioners in Upstate New York.

Authors:  Anthony C Waddimba; Melissa Scribani; Melinda A Hasbrouck; Nicole Krupa; Paul Jenkins; John J May
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Communication between neonatologists and parents when prognosis is uncertain.

Authors:  Laura L Drach; Debra A Hansen; Tracy M King; Erica M S Sibinga
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 6.  Big Data and Digital Solutions: Laying the Foundation for Cardiovascular Population Management CME.

Authors:  Khurram Nasir; Zulqarnain Javed; Safi U Khan; Stephen L Jones; Julia Andrieni
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec

7.  Balancing health care evidence and art to meet clinical needs: policymakers' perspectives.

Authors:  Louise E Parker; Mona J Ritchie; Joann E Kirchner; Richard R Owen
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  Health decision making: lynchpin of evidence-based practice.

Authors:  Bonnie Spring
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  What makes up good consultations? A qualitative study of GPs' discourses.

Authors:  Kaatje Van Roy; Stijn Vanheule; Myriam Deveugele
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Validation and cultural adaptation of a German version of the Physicians' Reactions to Uncertainty scales.

Authors:  Antonius Schneider; Joachim Szecsenyi; Stefan Barie; Katharina Joest; Thomas Rosemann
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.